Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
The idea that Trump is the spoiler for pro-White revival assumes that in the alternate timeline the massive pro-White surge created by yet another leftist victory (year 104 and counting of absolute leftist domination in all race-sex-religion contests, starting with the cunt vote in 1920) would overwhelm the circuit breakers.
That... just wasn't going to happen. Not even if they frauded Kamala into office.
-
Embed this notice
@judgedread It's a very dumb and ahistorical perspective which crumbles with any examination, but I am glad that you continue to poast those examinations, as it needs to be said
-
Embed this notice
@KarlDahl @judgedread the problem with accelerationism is that "worse is better" ends up dovetailing with standard conservatism quicker than they expect.
It's all an excuse to do nothing.
-
Embed this notice
@KarlDahl @judgedread But to dread's point of 1920 - it's really critical to look at this older stuff, because it helps you understand how we got here.
The most salient way to show people what happened with women's lib was how they immediately got alcohol banned. Everyone is willing to admit that was stupid. The only difference is a lot of people will (naturally) let the women not be responsible for their mistake.
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro @judgedread Ding ding
"Here's why being ineffective losers is good"
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro @KarlDahl @judgedread People (un?)intentionally misunderstand "accelerationism" all the time.
The actual meaning of the word is just causing escalation of political extremism by means of violence, usually by inflicting it on your enemies.
An attempt at accelerationism with have succeeded if either the political enemies begin engaging in political violence themselves, or if others with your beliefs are emboldened by your actions. The opposite of successful accelerationism is "nothing ever happens"-guys getting a total victory and no one is stirred to further violence.
-
Embed this notice
@Jens_Rasmussen @KarlDahl @judgedread yes, this is why people have gone and tried to be *explicit* about the type of accelerationism they want.
My solution is to stop labeling yourself by the tool you want to use to get where you want to go.