Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Tassoman (tassoman@orwell.fun)'s status on Wednesday, 11-Dec-2024 08:22:11 JST Tassoman

   • Evan Prodromou

   Please, specify: server for staff. Does it means not federated?

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Wednesday, 11-Dec-2024 08:22:10 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @tassoman https://evanp.me/pollfaq#define

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Thursday, 12-Dec-2024 06:10:54 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @tassoman I meant "for employees" but I didn't want to get into the distinction between employees, contractors, consultants, or whatever. "Staff" seems to cover them all.

   • Embed this notice
     Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Thursday, 12-Dec-2024 08:02:24 JST Evan Prodromou

     in reply to

     @tassoman you asked what I meant by "server for staff" and I told you.

     I realise there are other characteristics to an enterprise social network, but those weren't what I was asking about.

     In the future, if there are unspecified dimensions to a question that would change your answer, feel free to discuss them, and answer "qualified yes/no".

     And please don't frame the discussion as a question to me for clarification, because I don't do that.

   • Embed this notice
     Tassoman (tassoman@orwell.fun)'s status on Thursday, 12-Dec-2024 08:02:25 JST Tassoman

     in reply to

     • Evan Prodromou
     In my opinion role won't be exclusive. I would accept them all.
     
     But, organizations have different levels of "visibility" for documents.
     
     In fedi, for example can be: 1to1 chats, closed groups, global groups, and why not, federated posts. "Only to followers" visibility can be seen as a group but difficult to manage.
     
     Pleroma and derivated, plus Misskey have ability to post not federated, also (I can't say for other softwares).