Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Alex Rosenberg (alexr@mastodon.online)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 13:56:33 JST Alex Rosenberg

   • JL Lycette MD, author

   @JL_Lycette Their doctor is covered by malpractice insurance, right?

   • Embed this notice
     Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 13:56:32 JST Rich Felker

     in reply to

     • BurritoSommelier

     @BurritoSommelier @alexr Evaluating claims is practicing medicine, so doing it irresponsibly is malpractice. 😈

   • Embed this notice
     BurritoSommelier (burritosommelier@techhub.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 13:56:33 JST BurritoSommelier

     in reply to

     @alexr i assume you’re making some rhetorical point but can’t find it - why are you asking this about the post?

   • Embed this notice
     Alex Rosenberg (alexr@mastodon.online)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 15:41:15 JST Alex Rosenberg

     in reply to

     • Rich Felker
     • BurritoSommelier

     @dalias @BurritoSommelier Bingo. Sue for malpractice, enriching your lawyer and covering the medical bills and then some. Maybe these ghouls will learn.

   • Embed this notice
     Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 15:44:27 JST Rich Felker

     in reply to

     • BurritoSommelier

     @alexr @BurritoSommelier Ultimately they shouldn't be able to evaluate and deny claims. They should be required to immediately pay every claim filed by a licensed medical professional, and obligated to sue the provider, with obligation on them to provide all the evidence without access to confidential patient information, if they believe the provider is making fraudulent claims.