GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 05:05:08 JST Axel Rauschmayer Axel Rauschmayer

    Bluesky says that: “Never lose access to your followers or data.”

    However, I don’t think that’s true. Can someone confirm?

    Even in a scenario where there are multiple Relay/AppView/Labeler services, if you move to a different service:
    • You can only follow a user if their PDS is crawled by your service.
    • A user can only follow you if your PDS is crawled by their service.

    In conversation about 6 months ago from fosstodon.org permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sergey Shandar (functionalscript@techhub.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 05:05:08 JST Sergey Shandar Sergey Shandar
      in reply to

      @rauschma I think, we need to have an online open meeting or something like that. Because there are a lot of principles that are different with proper decentralization that are difficult to answer using centralized terminology. E.g. protocol has a different meaning in decentralized systems, it's more a math proof than transport logistic layer. BlueSky supports DID but I need to learn more. We need to change the way we think about digital space.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 05:38:15 JST Axel Rauschmayer Axel Rauschmayer
      in reply to
      • 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧)

      @serapath From what I know about Bluesky’s team, I believe that their intentions are good.

      But, eventually, they’ll have to make money.

      Upside: People have moved once (from Twitter to Bluesky). Moving again is going to be much easier and the Fediverse isn’t going anywhere.

      Only potential downside of ActivityPub that isn’t relatively easy to fix: It *may* not scale as well—no one knows at the moment. I’m curious: Could AP handle (e.g.) Taylor Swift joining the Fediverse?

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 05:38:15 JST silverpill silverpill
      in reply to
      • 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧)

      @rauschma @serapath

      >I’m curious: Could AP handle (e.g.) Taylor Swift joining the Fediverse?

      Yes.
      Today there are ~30000 servers in Fediverse, so to deliver a message to everyone via shared inboxes the server just needs to make 30000 HTTP requests. This is not much, even if account makes dozens of posts per day.

      The total number of servers is going to increase, but it will probably plateau somewhere between 100k and 1m.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧) (serapath@mastodon.gamedev.place)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 05:38:17 JST 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧) 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓱【ツ】☮(📍🇬🇧)
      in reply to

      @rauschma bluesky is broken by design. it only purpose is to subvert the fediverse. to sell a narrative and dont delive it so you can later capture and monetize.

      bluesky will enshittify and is a lesson to those who are still to naive despite the obvious facts.

      some ppl only learn when life teaches lessons, but we can spread the news so some can wake up before they sink more time into those dead ends 🤷♀️

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 06:52:44 JST Axel Rauschmayer Axel Rauschmayer
      in reply to
      • silverpill

      @silverpill That makes sense! Per-server caching significantly lessens the load.

      One remaining challenge is replies, profile data etc. being incomplete and/or out of date (you are working on that, IIRC). Thanks to per-server caching that shouldn’t cause too much additional traffic.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 06:52:44 JST silverpill silverpill
      in reply to

      @rauschma Replies can be synchronized between servers, but most people probably don't want to see all replies, I think small servers may choose to pull only most popular ones. We can also make various optimizations, such as activity batching (currently AP servers make a separate HTTP request for each activity delivery).

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sergey Shandar (functionalscript@techhub.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 07:06:49 JST Sergey Shandar Sergey Shandar
      in reply to

      @rauschma there is also a risk that owner or policies of your fediverse server is changed. No matter how you trust it, anything can happen. Twitter is an example.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 07:06:50 JST Axel Rauschmayer Axel Rauschmayer
      in reply to
      • Sergey Shandar

      @functionalscript
      For me it’s mostly about avoiding lock-in. And the Fediverse does that well enough (for my taste). Hopefully, it’ll eventually support domains or URLs as user handles. Which shouldn’t be too difficult(?)

      But there is definitely room for something even more decentralized—especially for people who have a high risk of being censored such as dissidents of totalitarian regimes. Such a solution will have different pros and different cons.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 08:43:27 JST Axel Rauschmayer Axel Rauschmayer
      in reply to
      • Sergey Shandar

      @functionalscript But if your user handle is a domain name (where a TXT record mentions the current server) then moving to another server is completely transparent.

      One could also do a simple form of content-addressing:
      my-server.example/@user.example/12345

      Such a URL could be routed to the correct server via the user handle. Then the path would work on every server. For complete transparency, one could use a domain that points to the current server.

      That would be good enough for my needs.

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Sergey Shandar (functionalscript@techhub.social)'s status on Monday, 09-Dec-2024 08:43:27 JST Sergey Shandar Sergey Shandar
      in reply to

      @rauschma Agree, people have different requirements. But we need to understand risks. There is still a risk that you forgot to maintain your domain, for example expired credit card. A proper DID is virtually forever with zero maintenance. https://github.com/did-method-plc/did-method-plc?tab=readme-ov-file#how-it-works

      In conversation about 6 months ago permalink

      Attachments

      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
        GitHub - did-method-plc/did-method-plc: Public Ledger of Credentials: a cryptographic, strongly-consistent, and recoverable DID method
        Public Ledger of Credentials: a cryptographic, strongly-consistent, and recoverable DID method - did-method-plc/did-method-plc

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.