Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 19:21:23 JST Phantasm
   >pleroma 2.7.1 released
   >still has the broken oban version
   >still has the follow req stuck pending bug
   • snacks and soberano like this.
   • Embed this notice
      (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 19:21:22 JST 

     in reply to
     @phnt I thought the latter has been fixed, probably if it is, it won't apply retroactively.
   • Embed this notice
     snacks (snacks@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 19:45:50 JST snacks

     in reply to
     @phnt wtf, why
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 20:53:57 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • 
     @mint It is fixed, but not merged into the 2.7.1 release even though the MR has a 2.7.1 milestone and it won't apply retroactively, because the remote server drops the activity for being invalid. The other follow bug was merged though.
     
     https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/4208
      likes this.
   • Embed this notice
      (mint@ryona.agency)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 20:54:04 JST 

     in reply to
     @phnt Hilarious.
   • Embed this notice
     snacks (snacks@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 00:47:10 JST snacks

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • Druid
     @phnt sorry @druid, i have been informed that pleroma releases are whack af now
   • Embed this notice
     Johnny Peligro, now on Mitra! (mischievoustomato@mitra.taihou.website)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 00:48:10 JST Johnny Peligro, now on Mitra!

     in reply to

     • snacks

     @snacks @phnt just pleroma™️ things

     snacks likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     snacks (snacks@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 00:51:21 JST snacks

     in reply to

     • Druid
     @phnt @druid i'm running akkoma, it's just about being able to follow pleromans
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 00:51:22 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • Druid
     @snacks @druid At this point just build your own patched OTP release or run purely from source.
     snacks likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     prettygood (prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 00:58:35 JST prettygood

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • Druid
     @phnt @druid @snacks is running from source inviting disaster? I feel like it might be
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 01:17:46 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • prettygood
     • Druid
     @prettygood @druid @snacks I've been running a source install since the beginning, because I expected I would need to patch things in the future. If you don't mind the gigabytes of build tools required for it to build, it's fine.
     
     Converting an OTP install to a source one is a different can of worms. It might be better to create your own OTP releases from a patched branch.
     
     Lanodan has an OTP build script for Gentoo which might give you some insight into how it should be done.
     https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/proj/guru.git/tree/www-apps/pleroma/pleroma-2.7.1.ebuild
     prettygood likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:05:58 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • Emi Yusa
     @GNUxeava
     >Akkoma
     soberano likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Emi Yusa (gnuxeava@fedi.absturztau.be)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:06:00 JST Emi Yusa

     in reply to
     @phnt pooroma
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:06:27 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • prettygood
     • Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1
     • Druid
     @eric @druid @prettygood @snacks From a Pleroma issue it seem that the OTP build uses Erlang 23 which didn't fully support OpenSSL 3, building with newer Erlang versions should work fine with OpenSSL 3. You can even use LibreSSL with a recent enough version of Erlang 26.
     prettygood likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:06:28 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • prettygood
     • Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1
     • Druid

     @eric @druid @snacks @prettygood In this case OTP means you have the code and you run mix release --overwrite --path pleroma and out should come a folder with all the binaries you need to run pleroma without Erlang and Elixir installed on the target system.

     Or at least I think it works like that. I never tried to run it like that outside of writing a package that mimics the Gentoo install script.

   • Embed this notice
     Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1 (eric@pl.starnix.network)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:06:29 JST Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • prettygood
     • Druid
     @phnt @druid @snacks @prettygood Isn't OTP outdated though? I think OTP depends on a deprecated version of OpenSSL
   • Embed this notice
     prettygood (prettygood@socially.drinkingatmy.computer)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:07:24 JST prettygood

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1
     • Druid
     @eric @phnt @druid @snacks that's what the Gentoo ebuild does yeah. That's how I've always had it installed. I know if I set the right unmask I can use the git tree version but that frankly sounds trepidatious
   • Embed this notice
     Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1 (eric@pl.starnix.network)'s status on Thursday, 28-Nov-2024 02:07:25 JST Eric Zhang 2: Episode 1

     in reply to

     • snacks
     • prettygood
     • Druid
     @phnt @druid @snacks @prettygood Oh so you're building OTP yourself then