Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
this is how you use the rules on the books to enforce stuff.
-
Embed this notice
@WandererUber what is better here is that it seems like they are going in already talking about using both obscure laws and the normal ones. There is much more of a feeling like they have a right to rule.
Which is kind of what some people were talking about how the progressives feel. It's very low energy compared to 2016, because I think people actually voting for trump twice has made them realize that their shit isn't actually popular.
They will complain otherwise, but they know their shit is pushed everywhere, so for it to be rejected is extremely blackpilling.
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro this is how you COULD use the rules...
people said the same thing about Trumps first term "here's an obscure law that gives him the power to build the wall anyway"
it became obvious very quickly that nobody was interested in doing it. I don't imagine this will turn out much different.
-
Embed this notice
@WandererUber whereas in 2016 is was kind of a "here's how we can do a few tricks and make the system run right"
-
Embed this notice
@coolboymew a bullshit censoring organization that allowed advertisers and magazines to pretend they weren't censoring, but just following the suggestions of an "independent organization"
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro newsguard?
-
Embed this notice
@leyonhjelm @WandererUber ah, but that's not in their head - Biden won in 2020, so "the people" voted for Biden.
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro
> people actually voting for trump thrice
FTFY
@WandererUber
-
Embed this notice
@sickburnbro @leyonhjelm then it's not even twice. they believe 16 was hacked by the Russians and this one by starlink
-
Embed this notice
@WandererUber @leyonhjelm that's the cope that the Qlibs use, but only the real crazy ones believe that thing were hacked that much twice.