Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   kaia (kaia@brotka.st)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 17:52:47 JST kaia
   since I can't have pci-e ssds due to missing slots: are SATA SSDs fast enough for storage?
   • Embed this notice
     Spooky Pink 🎃 (can@haz.pink)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 17:57:02 JST Spooky Pink 🎃

     in reply to

     @kaia no, I would only use them as bricks for building houses

     kaia likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     kaia (kaia@brotka.st)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 18:00:09 JST kaia

     in reply to

     • Spooky Pink 🎃
     @can
   • Embed this notice
     p (p@raru.re)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 19:32:57 JST p

     in reply to

     > fast enough for storage?

     typically, "for storage" drives are the slowest

     @kaia

     kaia likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Fluchtkapsel (fluchtkapsel@nerdculture.de)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 19:33:44 JST Fluchtkapsel

     in reply to

     @kaia What's the use case? I provisioned my NAS with SSDs. They are faster than the NAS network connection.

     kaia likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Oblomov (oblomov@sociale.network)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 22:36:07 JST Oblomov

     in reply to

     @kaia if the alternative is a spinning SATA disk, the answer is yes. The only thing spinning disks are better at than SSDs is storage per dollar

     kaia likes this.