@transgrammaractivist@udongle@JuicyGothMommyFeet@doctorsex For those watching: you plow your cash into a stock buyback because you have no other use for it. Thus all that liquidity isn't worth more than raising your stock price - you can't even find some capex to put it to.
Company I work for has done one (1) buyback while I was there. We: -did not have spare cash just lying around we 'did not know what to do with' -it was pretty explicit, at least internally, it was to inflate the stock price
@doctorsex@transgrammaractivist@udongle@JuicyGothMommyFeet the whole point of this conversation is that boomertard over here was saying that people want that sweet sweet liquidity that fink can provide. Buying your stock back is specifically changing the most liquid asset into one that is less liquid.
It's literally either a move entirely from desparation (which is punished by people dumping) or it's done by stable companies to manipulate market share. If it's the latter, there usually isn't much punishment because titans of industry capable of pulling off such a move can typically bank on momentum.
Depends on how big of a blunder it is. Violation of fiduciary duty has a fairly high bar. That said, if you fucked up bad enough, you probably would be replaced
But there are, as far as I know, several reasons to repurchase that aren't directly manipulation, and one good reason is if you feel your stock is under valued.
>By choosing big annual buybacks over larger dividends, Apple keeps things flexible—it’s like having an option open rather than committing to ongoing payments that don’t respond to how well the business does each year. Yeah, it's momentum then. Apple is the first company to be valued at >1 trillion. If they fell sufficiently below that, this would not be a sustainable strategy whatsoever. This is something that would not work for a smaller or more volatile company, period.
Off the top of my head, I would assume it's because of afformentioned planning to control market share. There could be some other reason, but again, they're a big enough company with a lot of momentum that could probably get away with something like that.
The smaller companies that *are* doing it and *doing it succesfully* are probably not very volatile though. >several reasons to repurchase that aren't directly manipulation, and one good reason is if you feel your stock is under valued. Doing a buyback to effect this is manipulation though. If you are likely at that point, your company is probably pretty stagnant. If you are a smaller company, it's probably better to put that money into diversifying for the ling term.