Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
i dont see why anyone would make an official paid-position effort to preserve games, when it's very obvious that fans will do that for free
-
Embed this notice
like the GOG preservation thing is all the most popular already well running games that have exhaustive pcgamingwiki pages, mods, active torrents, etc. it's worse than useless, since it sets an expectation that this is the way preservation should be done, and gives GOG the power to just say "yeah we won't preserve that game lol" and it'll go away forever if the fans don't do it. so responsibility always lies on fans. and torrents will always be the backup. why fight this?
-
Embed this notice
@why someone at a company that does that should just be responsible for providing the data in a portable and easily consumable format that fans then preserve. so like, the game, maybe a DOSBox configuration, the activation key, all in a zip file and provide a bencode checksum so people can be confident they're torrenting a known good archive
-
Embed this notice
@sun @why >bencode
NO U ARE THE BLOODY BENCODE. BASTERD GIFT CARD REDEEMER
-
Embed this notice
@sun i just cannot imagine anything about preservation happening
1. at a corporate company business profit shareholders business copyright legal above board professional level
and
2. sufficiently "preserved" and not lip service temporary bullshit
unless copyright is abolished (or taken down to ~15 years retroactively no exceptions)
or software piracy is considered fully legal no exceptions
-
Embed this notice
@why purely hypothetical, I don't see it happening either