Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Nov-2024 02:59:45 JST feld
   A Fediverse competitor should use Iroh as the transit mechanism
   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Nov-2024 06:49:13 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     @feld Can't we use it in Fediverse? I don't know how iroh works, but if it can deliver arbitrary JSON object to another machine, then it is compatible with ActivityPub

   • Embed this notice
     feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Nov-2024 06:53:41 JST feld

     in reply to

     • silverpill
     @silverpill it would replace HTTP for federation, plus you'd access nodes by their node id not their domain name so that gets weird
     
     But it could solve a bunch of issues and make it easier to host by not needing a static IP
   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Nov-2024 07:26:55 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     @feld I developed a transport agnostic object format for FEP-ef61. Looks like iroh-compatible object IDs could be derived in the same way as web-compatible IDs:

     { "id": "iroh://<node-id>/did🔑z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2/objects/dc505858-08ec-4a80-81dd-e6670fd8c55f", "type": "Note" }

     This ID contains:

     - "where": iroh://<node-id>/
     - "who": did🔑z6MkrJVnaZkeFzdQyMZu1cgjg7k1pZZ6pvBQ7XJPt4swbTQ2
     - "what": /objects/dc505858-08ec-4a80-81dd-e6670fd8c55f

     In theory that should be enough for nodes to communicate even if they are not directly connected (e.g. iroh and web), because the "where" part is not required for verification