@Thunderbolt_of_Kek Sounds like that guy is maintaining deniability or still carries jew malware.
The correct stand on the jews is their influence must be reduced to absolute zero. The question of means is entirely pragmatic. In no way should philo-semitism be encouraged.
I myself still carried jew malware in 2016, so it's not an absolute condemnation. The rootkit has burrowed deep into the presuppositions of most Americans.
But I doubt I'll read much of him because the ultimate sin in writing is not getting to the point.
@pirin04@Captobvious I spent a rather unconscionable amount of time today wading through his stuff, and I'm afraid I'm going to classify him as a mostly-useless windbag.
Some of his stuff is inarguable, but it has almost no practical application because it's so generalized. "Leaders need to manage affairs well in order to be successful" -- no shit, Sherlock. No shit.
As for the rest, I think @judgedread has much more incisive and detailed takes. For instance, this guy thinks White Nationalists are imitating jews by being ethnocentric, while Judge Dread had a post a month or so ago about how different groups take different routes to ethnocentrism, and the jews specialized in being a parasite swarm superorganism, while Aryans/Whites would be a productive/creative superorganism. That's more thought-provoking than this fellow's "nyuk nyuk, you're just like jews, nyuk nyuk" that leads to no conclusion and in fact goes nowhere beyond a shallow comparison -- "you're both breathing, so you're the same."
Infinitely-generalized commonplaces like "everything changes" or "people follow leftism because they get rewards," floating in oceans of his self-indulgent, windy, rambling, insubstantial bullshit.
If you get something of value out of him, I'm happy for you. But I wouldn't recommend too much wading to most people unless they have a LOT of time to waste, because there's basically nothing there but a sea of verbal diarrhea.
@dunedainmeta Team B has fewer jews - that is to say most jews, 80% or so, are Team A aligned. So just to get enough qualified men to staff all management positions they have to go outside the tribe.
Team A, in contrast, has essentially unlimited jewpower to fill every choice chokepoint, with only public facing roles requiring they keep the heebetude down to a dull kvroar.
@judgedread@dunedainmeta Following up with this comment, I read something awhile back that clarified the team b ethos and their production pipeline process.
It helps explain why team a is always at a disadvantage, regardless of their numbers.
"Their main goal is to avoid the disorder of the underclass, so for them, “good school” is a euphemism for white school. You can admit that here. Ha! Any school is enough for “college”.
What is alien for Fussell’s generation and probably most of you is what I call “The Thunderdome”. It is a school system of intensive winnowing and it is the main pipeline from which our nation’s elites are produced. This is the form of intense American meritocracy.
It begins when the aspirant elite is a toddler. They begin to take IQ tests to qualify for an elite preschool as well as personality screening. The cutoff for these tests is usually somewhere about 130. Some parents make their toddlers do test prep.
The stakes are high. If accepted, the Thunderdome begins. The toddler, then child, then teenager, begins to compete with their rival-peers for resources and attention.
The best survive, the rest are winnowed. Rank and yank. Ace the test or don’t come back. At every stage, advance. Never fail. A grade that isn’t an A is a permanent black mark on the transcript that will ruin your chances for Harvard. The child must have perfect grades, perfect grades, and perfect extracurriculars.
The leadership requirement means they must outmaneuver their rival-peers to take a club. Many cannot handle the pressure. The suicide rate is not insubstantial. Coffee is common. A common coping mechanism beyond caffeine is performance-enhancing drugs. A swift trade in amphetamines has developed, as well as cocaine. Anything to get an edge in the academic race.
The winners are the products of “meritocracy”, its blighted fruits. They are, as a rule, both brutal and conformist – conformity is a must to reach “perfection” as defined by a grading rubric. No principles but obedience. No desire but hunger.
An Ivy league professor, himself an alumnus, compared the commencement speech he had received, one calling for noblesse oblige and reminding them of their responsibilities, to the one his young students were receiving.
They were told thus: You are the fruits of meritocracy, and you deserve this and more. The world belongs to you by right. You must take of it. So eat, eat and never be full, and feast until the world’s ending – this is the truth of the world and what is right."
@sickburnbro@pirin04 I know, I think that when you assemble a list of 'most despicable and dishonest pseudo-RW faggots' Therno always seems to come out on top, regardless of category
I just despise NRx for their inability to learn basic writing discipline. Amateur hour sign.
@TrevorGoodchild@pirin04 I don't hold it against them too much. There is a reason why editors were historically paid handsomely.
Writing things down is a tough thing when you have a lot of thoughts. You can either write things down until your ideas emerge, or you can stew on them until you have distilled them in your head.
@pirin04@TrevorGoodchild that's what moldbug's kind of thing was, but the vast majority of the NRx people didn't really sign on to that - they mostly took his 'hey actually you should really just read primary sources' to heart.
In fact that is what lead to a huge revival in the holocaust revisionism stuff, which I appreciate, because I probably wouldn't have re-read all those documents.
verbally ejaculating 50,000 word essays like some political gooning coomer just to say, "it was the puritans." is absurd...then you find out they're jewish and it explains everything
Rothschild took over the Freemasons in 1750. Then came the American revolution led by prominent Freemasons, then the French Revolution led by prominent Freemasons. This was the beginning of the modern world, coinciding the way it did with the Industrial Revolution. Our jew problem goes back to the beginning.
@AmonMaritza@TrevorGoodchild@pirin04 I mean that's a reason to do it just period, and one of the reasons that forms of governments cycle, historically.