Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   TruthBait (truthbait@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:01:42 JST TruthBait

   And now the fun starts. I recommend people consider buying popcorn futures.

   https://www.thedailybeast.com/joe-bidens-vengeance-democrats-descend-into-civil-war/

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:01:41 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     @truthbait Biden had (by his own reckoning) the largest election fraud program in American history. 15 million one time 'voters' who came, voted once, then disappeared

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:01:41 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski @truthbait

     And what was that number in past and future elections?

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:19:48 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     You are claiming in other elections there wasnt a single one time voter? That sounds absurdly untrue. Source for that.

     @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:19:49 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     @freemo @truthbait 15 million less, yes

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:31:41 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     You certainly dont. When you make up numbers you pull from your ass that would be quite the inconvenience for you indeed.

     @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:31:42 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     @truthbait @freemo the voting numbers. But I don't need to google shit for tarded old bears

   • Embed this notice
     TruthBait (truthbait@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:31:43 JST TruthBait

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
     • Soretski

     The source is anyone's nose. Sh't don't pass the sniff test. @freemo @Soretski

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:32:28 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @truthbait

     Ahh gotcha, nose citation. I will give the weight your nose as a source deserves, thanks.

     @Soretski

   • Embed this notice
     TruthBait (truthbait@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:32:29 JST TruthBait

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
     • Soretski

     He just wants to argue anyway. If he can't see what's happening he's trying hard not to. @Soretski @freemo

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:32:52 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @truthbait

     Nah, I went into it hoping the numbers would be significant and would be worth discussing. But when you dont compare it to the numbers in other elections you literally are saying nothing of any relevance. I have nothing to even compare to see if its unusual or credible.

     I generally assume there is corruption everywhere and most people, are manipulators and idiots, so i would expect election fraud to be very likely. But when i ask for something as simple as the actual numbers so i can evaluate it and i get stupidity cranked up to 11 I am going to quickly dismiss it and move on as i am doing now.

     @Soretski

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:43:00 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @truthbait

     One time voters (someone who votes in one election and doesnt in subsequent) is **not** reported and a quick search only returns first time voters, which is a very different thing.

     Clearly im not as smart as you since I cant find the numbers under biden vs trump for **one** time voters...

     Its almost like you just made up the numbers and dont even have a source at this point.

     @Soretski

   • Embed this notice
     TruthBait (truthbait@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:43:01 JST TruthBait

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
     • Soretski

     The numbers are really easy to find. They're reported everywhere. So if you're unable to source them it's because you're deliberately remaining ignorant. @freemo @Soretski

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:46:03 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @truthbait

     I mean hell it doesnt even make sense. This is the first election since then and the votes havent been cataloged yet. How would they even know how many of the voters in 2020 didnt vote in 2024, I wouldnt even expect that information to be available yet.

     So again all signs point to completely made up numbers with no real basis in reality. More than happy to see a source and consider it but considering that your crying like a little baby at a question that amounts to "where can i check that fact" tells me all I need to know.

     @Soretski

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:51:41 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     @freemo @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 05:51:41 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     What does this image have to do with one time voters? I didnt ask anything at all about popular votes or even if the election was a fraud, we didnt even get that far. You stated a fact about one time voters... again, where can i see the source of that fact?

     @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:12:25 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     @freemo @truthbait I said facetiously that they voted once then never again. In truth there was obvious ballot stuffing to a nuclear (again I don't mean literally) scale. 15 million more votes one election never before, never again. I don't need to debate the obvious, and if you do there's something off about you.

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:12:25 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     Fair enough, if you didnt mean what you said literally and were just trying to say that biden got an unusually high popular vote that is higher than what democrats typically have gotten, then sure. I will be happy to grant you that.

     That said it isnt particularly compelling on its own as an argument for election fraud, especially since he only ran once, so we have no idea. I mean if that is the argument used one could say the same aboutn Trump, that he got an unusually high popular vote as well compared to past elections.

     @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     AlphaKiloPapa☭⃠ (alphakilopapa@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:21:09 JST AlphaKiloPapa☭⃠

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
     • Soretski

     @Soretski @freemo @truthbait What happened in 2020 was statistically impossible. That election was dirtier than a 10¢ whore. Plain as day.

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:21:09 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • AlphaKiloPapa☭⃠
     • Soretski

     @AlphaKiloPapa

     I take it this is like your other statement. You dont actually know the statistical probability and are just saying it to basically mean "man that seems unusual"?

     Given the riots at the time, philly was literally on fire, something i never witnessed in my life, it makes perfect sense to me that we saw a record turnout **on both sides**. What i find strange is that despite there being record turnouts on both sides it is only suggestive of fraud on Biden's side.

     @Soretski @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:22:07 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     @freemo @truthbait this dude thinks he's Socrates, but he's just acting stupid and demanding I prove the obvious. I don't even know what he's doing here or how he glommed on to waste my time but he's one moronic chin scratch away from the mute button.

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:22:07 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     I didnt demand anything. Now that you explained you didnt actually mean what you were saying and instead just meant "he had an unusually high turnout" I simply agreed with you. The only person insisting on arguing nonsense beyond that is you. I accepted the explanation with no objection.

     @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:27:12 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • AlphaKiloPapa☭⃠
     • Soretski

     @AlphaKiloPapa

     Sorry should have been more clear, I meant the assertion this thread is based on about one-time voters which was not meant literally apparently but to mean "there was a higher than normal turnout" which was true but very different than what was originally said.

     @Soretski @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     AlphaKiloPapa☭⃠ (alphakilopapa@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:27:13 JST AlphaKiloPapa☭⃠

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
     • Soretski

     @freemo @Soretski @truthbait What other statement?

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:41:15 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     I see your not too bright. I never said it was or wasnt fraud. Unless your claiming it wasnt unusually high now? You were literally trying to claim it was unusually high and thats your reasoning (or at least part of it) as to why it is fraud, and now your acting like a toddler because I agreed that it was unusually high, lol. Takes a special sorta stupid, I cant even make this shit up.

     @truthbait

   • Embed this notice
     Soretski (soretski@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:41:16 JST Soretski

     in reply to

     • 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     @freemo @truthbait omg. 15 million isn't unusually high vote count. It's fraud you fat fuck

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 08-Nov-2024 06:48:28 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Soretski

     @Soretski

     And again, when you look at the chart from 1900s onward the number is not even at all unusual, it follows exactly the trend of the numbers since the 1900s just fine, almost exactly what you'd expect given the trend. See attached.

     @truthbait