Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   anna (navi@social.vlhl.dev)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 20:08:50 JST anna
   bitwarden's sdk is foss again, yay
   
   (i'm still moving to pass though, pass is comfy)
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 20:08:49 JST 翠星石

     in reply to
     @navi GNU/Jihad against "FOSS"!
     
     The sdk has always been proprietary, it's just that recently there was a change made where the desktop client would not compile without the proprietary sdk; https://github.com/bitwarden/clients/issues/11611
     
     The current revert is just to resume what was occurring before - bitwarden was mostly GPLv3.0-only, with some proprietary modules (it appears that bitwarden holds all relevant copyrights and if they do, note that a copyright holder cannot infringe their own license).
   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 20:09:02 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • lumi :blobcatnom: :blobcatflower:
     @lumi keepassxc
   • Embed this notice
     lumi :blobcatnom: :blobcatflower: (lumi@snug.moe)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 20:09:03 JST lumi :blobcatnom: :blobcatflower:

     in reply to

     @navi i am still unsure of what i want to do with my password manager situation
     
     right now what i use is something that was dropped by its original maintainer, where i started maintaining it myself and removed everything i don't use. it's comfy to have completely audited your password manager. but it's also super non-standard aaaaa
     
     what made me not use pass, many years ago, is that you could look at the entries that exist without the master key. and i want to hide the entries as well