How do you make accessibility annotations at all useful without designers and developers needing in depth knowledge of html and aria?
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Emma (emmadawsondev@a11y.info)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 04:52:43 JST Emma -
Embed this notice
Evil Jim O’Donnell (eatyourgreens@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 04:52:33 JST Evil Jim O’Donnell @sarajw @emmaDawsonDev Doug Abrams wrote about this recently. There’s a generation of developers that know components, not HTML elements.
I think the link is originally via the mighty @SteveFaulkner
-
Embed this notice
Sara Joy :happy_pepper: (sarajw@front-end.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 04:52:34 JST Sara Joy :happy_pepper: @emmaDawsonDev I would be very annoyed by that!
In conversation permalink alcinnz repeated this. -
Embed this notice
Emma (emmadawsondev@a11y.info)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 04:52:40 JST Emma @sarajw hmm, it’s a very hard thing to balance. I understand things can’t be too technical but a certain level of technicality is needed or the annotations are just meaningless. I may also just be annoyed being told that my feedback was too technical when I said a radio group needs a label
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Sara Joy :happy_pepper: (sarajw@front-end.social)'s status on Thursday, 07-Nov-2024 04:52:41 JST Sara Joy :happy_pepper: @emmaDawsonDev good question. Arguably developers should be able to go change html and aria attributes without it being a large problem.
Lots of links to explainers? MDN? 😬
In conversation permalink
-
Embed this notice