Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 20:58:57 JST Eugen Rochko

   • かき@GNUsocialJP

   This year I shot 24 rolls of 35mm film and 15 rolls of 120... So far, at least.

   • Embed this notice
     dansup (dansup@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:08:07 JST dansup

     in reply to

     @Gargron Iconic! There is something about film that digital can't reproduce!

   • Embed this notice
     GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺 (eetschrijver@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:09:15 JST GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺

     in reply to

     @Gargron Wow, 120. I didn't even think that still existed.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:21:08 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP

     If you want to see a selection of my work, you can visit my portfolio: https://eugenrochko.com/

   • Embed this notice
     Ben Royce 🇺🇦 (benroyce@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:22:47 JST Ben Royce 🇺🇦

     in reply to

     • dansup

     @dansup @Gargron

     Rochester NY here

     thanks for keeping the shadow of the once mighty Kodak empire alive

   • Embed this notice
     Alex Camilleri (alexkalopsia@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:27:44 JST Alex Camilleri

     in reply to

     @Gargron are you using a specific CMS?

     Sharing some of my work (need to update blog and portfolio so that I also get that cool "More from" :) )

     https://photography.alexcamilleri.com/

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:30:07 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP
     • Alex Camilleri

     @alexkalopsia No, I coded a custom website with React/Next.js.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:34:30 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP
     • ⁂ Shevek ⁂

     @shevek What a depressing view. The process is at least as important as the end result.

   • Embed this notice
     ⁂ Shevek ⁂ (shevek@mstdn.io)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:34:31 JST ⁂ Shevek ⁂

     in reply to

     @Gargron Sorry, but I can't see the point shooting with chemical films, then develop them, then make copies, then digitize the copies/negative.

     It is more straight forward shooting with digital machine. All steps reduced in one.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:40:33 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP
     • Sandor

     @sandor Canon AE-1 Program, Pentax KX and Pentax 6x7. I note the gear on every photo.

   • Embed this notice
     Sandor (sandor@social.appbakery.ee)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:40:34 JST Sandor

     in reply to

     @Gargron what rifle did you use?

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:44:53 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP
     • ⁂ Shevek ⁂

     @shevek I don't see uploading to the web as the goal of photography, but as a side effect. I keep all my negatives and I print some of them.

   • Embed this notice
     ⁂ Shevek ⁂ (shevek@mstdn.io)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:44:54 JST ⁂ Shevek ⁂

     in reply to

     @Gargron I've been traditional photographer. I used to shoot slides.

     So I understand the magic of chemical photography for itself, but I don't understand the use of chemical films if the goal is uploading to web. For this purpose digital cameras are the right way, IMHO.

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:51:27 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP
     • ⁂ Shevek ⁂

     @shevek Negatives have insane resolution, that's true. And a used analog camera is much cheaper than a DSLR that shoots comparable resolution.

   • Embed this notice
     ⁂ Shevek ⁂ (shevek@mstdn.io)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 21:51:28 JST ⁂ Shevek ⁂

     in reply to

     @Gargron This is a possible answer I was thinking of. The other is, that perhaps scanning a negative yields better results, nowadays, than right shoot with mid-quality DSLR.

   • Embed this notice
     Karl Ramberg (karlramberg@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 03-Nov-2024 23:32:37 JST Karl Ramberg

     in reply to

     @Gargron Mastodon-photographers unite!

   • Embed this notice
     Fedor Indutny (indutny@fosstodon.org)'s status on Monday, 04-Nov-2024 04:22:13 JST Fedor Indutny

     in reply to

     @Gargron what do you shoot 120 with?

   • Embed this notice
     Eugen Rochko (gargron@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 04-Nov-2024 04:22:13 JST Eugen Rochko

     in reply to

     • かき@GNUsocialJP
     • Fedor Indutny

     @indutny Pentax 6x7