do you want to end with linux-cn being a fork that lives entirely in its own ecosystem? because this is how you get linux-cn be a fork that lives entirely in its own ecosystem you are effectively excluded from
@whitequark but why are people acting like this is a new thing? Laws are laws. This is not a new thing in the open source community. It was obvious that this was OFAC related
@sun@whitequark you're not always allowed to speak of it. Like when ITAR was in effect on certain products, @SlicerDicer could not even reveal the existence of certain things on his MK15 to anyone. Period. I don't even think he was even supposed to mention ITAR to anyone.
@dramforever@whitequark I don't know why *any* Chinese company is allowed to have access to anything that has cryptography from the West. It's very confusing how this stuff is selectively enforced.
@feld@SlicerDicer@whitequark then they should just shut up and take their abuse because nobody else is obligated to accept that explanation for an open source project.
@feld@SlicerDicer@whitequark I am actually curious of they were really obligated not to talk about it because like, I have been denied access to a financial website because they told me I matched a name on the OFAC list. They didnt' even hide it from me that that was the reason they denied me.
@feld@sun@whitequark I can show it to American citizens but taking things out of the country or showing non citizens is a problem. It’s better to just not talk about it in the concept of loose lips sink ships.
Even today they may not be itar but they are arms export control for sure.
@whitequark@SlicerDicer@sun why? cryptography is a munition and is similarly export controlled. There's cryptography in the kernel, both IPSEC and KTLS now
@sun@feld@whitequark Just as example one of my former clients worked at Boeing and when unapproved people came in they covered things with tarps. So like what I’m gonna tarp my house?
@sun@feld@whitequark Yeah it’s pain in ass, working doing it is far easier than actually owning it and the requirements. Some of my ITAR stuff can never be sold. It can only be returned to vendor. Each one has its own rules and it’s on me to keep that safe. It’s my problem if I mess up and it’s not in a controlled environment. It’s in my house.
@feld@SlicerDicer@sun this hasn't mattered since 1995, but if it somehow started, the correct move here is to relocate the Linux Foundation from countries with such idiotic regulation to somewhere more reasonable, not to yield to it and then whine on the mailing list about how everyone around is a "russian troll"
@whitequark@SlicerDicer@sun hasn't mattered since 1995? Then why do we still have to register our cryptography-containing software with the government in 2024?
Why did FreeBSD have to expel Iranian committer Babak Farrokhi? Oh right, the export sanctions that "hasn't mattered since 1995".
I don't recall when exactly he lost his access as my mail archives don't go back far enough, but we weren't able to welcome him back until 2015. I know for sure because I was the first person to welcome him back on the internal developer mailing list.
@SlicerDicer@feld@sun I am not in the USA, thank gods, and if your government prevents you from contributing to open-source projects like Linux you should either emigrate or take up arms in rebellion or something
@SlicerDicer@whitequark I don't think this is directly relevant but yeah, they don't have anything like the 5th Amendment protections so they can force you to hand that over.
Though this stupid country will come up with other ways to ruin your life and the NSA will violate your privacy without any recourse. Gotta love it. 3 letter agencies get to just shit all over our rights.
@whitequark@feld@sun >> cite any UK regulation to me that prevents me from accepting patches from someone on the OFAC sanctions list
In the United Kingdom, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act gives UK police the powers to force suspects to decrypt files or hand over passwords that protect encryption keys. Failure to comply is an offense in its own right, punishable on conviction by a two-year jail sentence or up to five years in cases involving national security.