@Suiseiseki@PurpCat I would love windows 10 users to move to linux, but I just don't think it will happen very frequently. What really is the future market of windows though? Most users will be very happy with something like chrome os. I could see a lot of gamers moving to linux thanks to steam. Outside of core gamers, who is running windows? If Apple/Google made it so you could dock your phone/tablet and use it with a keyboard/mouse/monitor, wouldn't that just eliminate PCs for 90% of users?
At minimum, people would need to move to the systemd/Linux OS, or systemd for short.
>What really is the future market of windows though? There is no real future market - microsoft has stuck onto computing like the parasite they are, using every possible illegal practice to keep it going, but the usage of windows keeps dropping.
>Most users will be very happy with something like chrome os. ChromeOS is Gentoo GNU/Linux with the freedom removed.
>Outside of core gamers, who is running windows? Business types that have been handcuffed into systems restricted by microsoft and their buddies and those who bought a computer or a laptop that came with windows is the primary used of windows.
>If Apple/Google made it so you could dock your phone/tablet and use it with a keyboard/mouse/monitor, wouldn't that just eliminate PCs for 90% of users? Android (uses the kernel, Linux, but sucks as GNU is missing) already supports keyboards/mouses and some devices do HDMI or DP over USB-C, so you can use such devices like a PC, although such is unusable until you at least install Termux and GNU on that (Termux offers a Xorg client).
Most iOS devices support monitor output and a keyboard and mouse now (better buy all the dongles).
@parker@menherahair microsoft does not compile windows server with gcc and simply compiling something with gcc doesn't make it GNU.
windows used to use GNU make as part of the build system, but not anymore - they use their own terrible build system instead.
You could run GNU software on windows server, but the whole idea of a server is that it's meant to be actually stable, thus you're much better off wiping the server and installing GNU/Linux and running GNU software with no constraints.
@gray A large portion *does* need one, although many are so reckless with abandon for basic human dignity that they want everything to go through demon rectangles.
@Nudhul People don't commonly use LiGNUx simply because it's not what comes on the computer.
GNU is good for the average person, as it at least respects their freedom.
Functionally wise, it seems that those not corrupted by windowisms actually find DE's easier to use and even then only those who should not use a computer will refuse to use an OS just because the GUI is not exactly like windows.
@Suiseiseki why when you can do everything through the internet or apps on their phones? the only thing a PC is good at is gaming or doing things like photo/video editing.
>GNU is good for the average person, as it at least respects their freedom.
this is not something the average person cares about. they want ultra simplicity. if they cant see a desktop shortcut for a program it might as well not exist.
@parker >The software just doesn't yet exist on systemd/Linux for a lot of business applications, I'm not sure what you mean. There is more software available on GNU/Linux than windows, especially for business tasks.
A lot of the time what a business needs is custom software and it will save them a huge amount of time and money to get something for GNU/Linux that works properly and doesn't have a monthly rent, then get something on windows that doesn't work properly and have a huge rent.
>most people can't/won't spend time fiddling with some command line based alternative when that time could be spent making money from clients The whole idea is that they're free software replacements, rather than mere alternatives.
In many cases, a CLI or TUI interface is much faster than a GUI.
It's a waste of time to make money from clients if you have to hand most of it over to a proprietary master.
>when the industry standards expected by regulators only exist on Winblows. A proprietary program is never an industry standard - there is a proprietary master and servants that have to do as the master says.
There is real industry standard software on GNU/Linux like asterisk and nginx etc.
@Suiseiseki@PurpCat The software just doesn't yet exist on Linux for a lot of business applications, and most people can't/won't spend time fiddling with some command line based alternative when that time could be spent making money from clients, or when the industry standards expected by regulators only exist on Winblows.
@gray You cannot do meaningful or profitable work on a touchscreen, thus all of such activities are either optional wastes of time, or artificially created.
@gray I can use a touch screen just as well as anyone else can - I just have the knowledge of what computers can and should do and understand how hard touchscreens limit such.
The easiest way to demonstrate such would be to install the Emacs OS onto Android and try to use it effectively on a touchscreen (you can't).
@PurpCat@Suiseiseki@Rocket literally every business runs windows and/or windows server, pays for business office 365, some pay for intune or have windows servers. In some sectors linux only used for specific things.