It's wild how social media outside of the fediverse has deteriorated. You have followers, but if your post doesn't please some opaque algorithm, they'll never see what you post. You have to avoid certain words to please the algorithm. If you refresh the page good luck finding the same posts again. And people put up with it.
@Gargron I find it amazing also on YouTube. I watch some people that monitor the current war situations in ukraine and the middle east and they can't use the words "kill" or even "terrorist", "hamas", "hezbollah" and more without at least getting demonitized or blocked. It is complete bonkers and only going to get worse with every state in the world now taking shots at forbidding unwanted things
@Gargron "put up with it"? I'd go a step further and say it doesn't matter for most. Social media provides the illusion of being heard, and can thus satisfy the narcissism and obsessions of billions.
ISTM that the algorithm is just automating the intolerance to dissenting views and trigger-happy blocking, that has become so prevalent in current society, even in the fediverse.
people like to blame the algorithm for that, but what if that's backwards?
I used to think the whole "the algorithm kills content" sentiment was super sensationalized until huge YouTubers started censoring words like "kill" "die" or even "gun" . Then TikTok people don't even write those words on their vids, but have to censor it like "k!LL" . Maybe I'm just a hag but it happened SO FAST like a switched flipped and weird censorship started just this year. Was it so much earlier? God I'm always so tardy to the party
@Gargron I've tried to convince FB connections to switch here. But I wonder how many saw my FB post with links to Mastodon and the Fediverse. :thaenkin:
@Gargron the article ends with these infuriating lines: « She’ll keep on posting, she says: “I’ll do a little yelling into the void.” Unfortunately for our democracy, she doesn’t have a lot of other choices. »
It’s such a missed opportunity not to mention the Fediverse and its chronological feeds / lack of opaque algorithms.
Once I’m properly caffeinated I will write an email to Mr. Fowler and also post a comment on the article…
@Gargron it's way more obscure than that. I follow an artist (stuz0r) who's art posts reach hardly anyone anymore, but their text posts trying to figure out why reach *everyone*
They use the dead bird site because of freedom of speech but the dead bird site applies an algorithm that dictates what you see and who can see what you say.
@Gargron Well, as Willie Sutton famously said when asked why he robbed banks, "That's where the money is."
Twitter, Instagram, etc., have really become influencer platforms. Facebook, too, though to a slightly lesser degree. Jack Dorsey's new Blue Sky (or whatever he's calling it) could become that as well.
The face of what social media is has changed since the '00s; for the time being, I'd rather be here on Mastodon.
Download Earnweb app and earn money anywhere, anytime. Exchange Coins for valuable rewards: ✅Gift Cards ✅PayPal ✅Crypto ...and way more Earnweb app download and install version -Android country- US, GB, DE, CA, FR, AU, NL,
@Gargron The Post pulls an interesting trick to distort poll results. It takes a poll which says "20 percent of U.S. adults now regularly get news on the [Instagram] social network" and recasts it as "One in five American adults regularly get their news from Instagram."
Adding the word "their" suggests IG is the primary or exclusive news source for 1 in 5. The poll only says that people "get news" from it.
@Gargron One of the most absurd things to me is the power given to the algorithm over our language. The way it is changing, shaping and erasing words from our collective vocabulary.
I'm curious to know if there's ever been quite this level of interference in language before.