Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 06:22:49 JST clacke Researchers developed sustainable cellulose glitter that poses no toxicity to soil organisms, unlike PET glitter. - Alexandre Oliva and Linux Walt (@lnxw37j1) {3EB165E0-5BB1-45D2-9E7D-93B31821F864} like this.
-
Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 06:24:19 JST clacke When I first saw the title "Plant-Based Glitter Does Not Harm Soil Organisms", it was in a context that truncated part of the title so that it said "Based Glitter Does Not Harm Soil Organisms" -
Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 06:24:56 JST clacke @bonkers Nobody needs dessert either, but if it doesn't cause disproportional harm to the environment, I don't see why people shouldn't enjoy it. -
Embed this notice
Bonkers (bonkers@nerdculture.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 06:24:57 JST Bonkers @clacke please explain why anyone needs glitter
-
Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:32:49 JST clacke @mansr @bonkers Because it gets in your mouth? -
Embed this notice
Mans R (mansr@society.oftrolls.com)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:32:51 JST Mans R @bonkers @clacke Dessert can be eaten or not, simple choice. With glitter, there is no opt-out.
-
Embed this notice
Bonkers (bonkers@nerdculture.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:32:53 JST Bonkers @clacke sugar helps my brain spin, so dessert is not a completely useless thing.
-
Embed this notice
Mans R (mansr@society.oftrolls.com)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:33:14 JST Mans R clacke likes this. -
Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Thursday, 17-Oct-2024 16:33:15 JST clacke @mansr I had two possible interpretations, either you meant there is no opt-out of glitter, because come on, how can you not want glitter, and the other one was that once glitter is there, you physically have no way to opt out.
I honestly thought you meant the former, so I thought I was making a joke by interpreting it as the latter!