Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 07-Oct-2024 12:37:49 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

   • ArdainianRight
   > That's my cat
   
   Oof
   • Embed this notice
     Quentel (quentel@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 07-Oct-2024 12:45:13 JST Quentel

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight

     They're going down a dark road with 'disaster equity'.

     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 07-Oct-2024 12:50:44 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     • Quentel
     I think there's a reason they're trying to distinguish equity from equality, it's so they can put judges in who will split hairs on existing case law and decide that equity doesn't violate Am. V or Am. XIV re due process / equal protection, and therfore, only rational basis should apply.
   • Embed this notice
     Quentel (quentel@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Monday, 07-Oct-2024 12:57:44 JST Quentel

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight

     That's a dark thought. Pure unrestrained state-level power that could be traded like a commodity.

     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Monday, 07-Oct-2024 13:00:44 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ArdainianRight
     • Quentel
     From time to time over the last few decades, Thomas has actually opined on something similar. He basically says that minority status is something people will just vote themselves into. So the majority will declare themselves victims and get all of the benefits of state resources while billing the minority for it.
     
     We all know what happens after that. Collapse.