@niner > idk i just picked the one the website listed I now have come to the realization why websites like to put proprietary licenses up as the default option - people who haven't been taught better will make the mistake of selecting such.
The maliciousness of what github does now makes a lot of sense to me - by default they seem to list MIT expat or "GPLv3" (with no option for -only, or -or-later) - so people either choose a pushover license, or leave it ambiguous if the project is GPLv3-only or GPLv3-or-later.
>i down own the series and stuff Series are not "owned", although the copyright holder of the drawings of characters can restrict who can draw and share derivatives of such character.
As such cursor is arguably a parody, it appears that such cursor distribution is not forbidden, but unfortunately, as you are not the only copyright holder, you cannot offer a license and all you can do is note that such work is a parody and everyone can do what's allowed for parodies.
@Suiseiseki i could do that :jahy_ayaya: idk i just picked the one the website listed for copyright since its just a fanart thing too and i down own the series and stuff
@niner No, as you do not hold all of the copyright - the legal argument is that fanart of a specific character is a derivative work of the original and therefore the copyright holder of the original character drawing(s) holds part of it.
If it wasn't that a severely limited subset of parody doesn't require copyright permission, you would be required to ask the copyright holder of the character drawing(s) for permission to legally draw fanart.
If you were to negotiate with the copyright holder, you could release the work under a license.