In general, on foreign policy, MAGA Republicans want to be isolationist. Establishment Dems want to dominate the world while saying everything we're doing is in everybody's best interest. The left wants to work through the UN, letting the world community truly make the decisions and doing whatever they require of us. Or at least that's my reading of it. #uspol
Muslims are commanded by their God to murder the unbelievers, especially the Jews. Too many of them eagerly accept this goal as their own. How exactly do you think a piece of paper is going to solve that little issue? It's not about land. It's about Jews living outside of Sharia. How many should be forced into sharia to pacify the Jihad? 30%? 50%? Because they want 100%. But I eagerly await your final solution. @wjmaggos
I don't think I said that. Ultimately everything is going to come down to agreements of "you do this, we'll do that". hopefully before violence starts, but afterwards if peace can't be sustained.
I'm a lefty. We affect each other and we are always going to be self interested and somewhat blind to other's concerns. The first two options are not sustainable long-term. Problems fester. We have interests that voters won't let us ignore. Better to always be negotiating and deal fairly.
@dcc@truthbait@wjmaggos personally I believe world war 2 was equally against anglo mind control as much as jew mind control. The enslavement by anglo, the British, who had spent hundreds of years pitting different European countries against each other
no conspiracy is necessary. one might say the conspiracy mindset is a good distraction and way to keep people divided.
it's capitalism. the drive for profit leads corporations to manipulate politicians to use govts to serve their interests at home and abroad. the US is only the most obvious example because it has the most powerful military and provides voters with the least ability to make govt serve the public over the interests of donors.
@dcc@truthbait@wjmaggos some would say the ones driving every current conflict is the US after ww2 with it’s numerous regime change operations through CIA and NGO’s. Every conflict goes back to US since it needs to expand in infinity to maintain power. When it’s all under it’s control it will start eating up the people in the countries it has control over for resources. Some other people say it isn’t the anglo mindset but that jews are actually behind the behavior of anglo rulers
@Diceyocean@dcc@wjmaggos@truthbait the very reason world war 2 broke out was because anglos placed a hostile to germany pole in charge of poland and then got canaris to feed hitler false intel about the soviets planning an attack, which caused operation barbarossa to break out
I do not want to end capitalism but the incentives it plays into can eat away at society. same with socialism. we will never have either fully, and would hate it if we did. the best is a mixed economy with a strong democracy which we have to keep getting better at but also won't agree about cause it will affect everyone differently.
@lina@Diceyocean@dcc@truthbait@wjmaggos this is like the 4th different interpretation on the cause of ww2 I've seen from russians online and I've never seen any of them repeated within or without that context
@menherahair@Diceyocean@dcc@truthbait@wjmaggos if canaris got executed later and fed false intel to hitler about the normandy landings then he definitely caused operation barbarossa, all in spite of the soviets and the third reich cooperating before the operation
@Diceyocean@dcc@wjmaggos@truthbait that is the case yea, it's only natural the rothschilds and the other scum went from a smaller isolated island to an entire isolated continent to fuck with the world from
@lina@dcc@wjmaggos@truthbait yes but just saying the game of putting European against each other is 100 of years old. They were pirate merchants feeding of us poor innocent Europeans
so you think wealth doesn't naturally concentrate, monopolies aren't inevitable and the ability to buy influence in the media won't bias who becomes our representatives? I do. add to this representatives getting paid off indirectly or afterwards.
and when this happens, a fully free market system that already leaves a lot of "losers" to suffer and die, leaves out more. and they organize to change the system. the cost to control them makes things worse etc.
Capitalism isn't the problem. Human corruption is the problem. I've yet to see the system that isn't infected with it. That's because humans are infected with it. Therefore, let's go with the system where the fewest corrupt humans have influence over people's daily lives. That's called free market capitalism under a representative republic. @anemone@dcc@wjmaggos@Diceyocean
your post was not very clear but I think I responded to it. we are going to disagree on what we want in that mix and struggle to get it against those with more money when capitalism gives those more power in the democracy.
we must keep increasing the critical thinking of the public, the information flow and the responsiveness of the electoral system. shit does get better. the alternative is weak govt and assholes dominate, or you get a dictator.
@wjmaggos@dcc@truthbait anyway they achieved their goals. The anglospere has replaced most of the native culture in European countries with a globalist McDonald’s type of instagram Netflix culture. It’s all ruined
@wjmaggos@dcc@truthbait with the case of British they had a way that was without honor to use European countries to enrich themselves that led up to ww2. Europe was the Arabs for British during hundreds of years