Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   djsumdog (djsumdog@djsumdog.com)'s status on Wednesday, 18-Sep-2024 06:45:50 JST djsumdog

   in reply to

   • Chris ABRAHAM
   It's an incredibly complex issue, because you're fundamentally dealing with two sets of human rights. You either have to place one set of rights over the other, or deny the second human is human.
   
   With the Dobbs decision, now individual US states get to decide, in these cases, what a person/human consists of legally.
   
   Should a federalized nation dictate such a critical definition of fundamental rights to individual states?
   • Embed this notice
     Chris ABRAHAM (chris@abraham.su)'s status on Wednesday, 18-Sep-2024 06:45:51 JST Chris ABRAHAM

     The unintended consequence of this campaign strategy could reduce women solely to their biology—to breeding vessels—deeply reductive, stripping them of full personhood by fixating on a singular aspect of their identity. This monofocus, framed as virtue and empowerment, ironically dehumanizes. But who knows? Maybe it'll work. It probably will.