Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Sep-2024 08:23:37 JST Bread up, Bro

   in reply to

   • internetfreak
   • Bloodytailspike
   • Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.
   • Poast Oak
   • Griffith
   • transgrammaractivist
   • opossum
   @poastoak @transgrammaractivist @Griffith @doctorsex @internetfreak @monsterislandcolonizer @opossum again you can call it what you want, but there is hard power and soft power.
   
   "Legitimacy" as BM is calling it is basically soft power.
   • Embed this notice
     Poast Oak (poastoak@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 04-Sep-2024 08:23:38 JST Poast Oak

     • internetfreak
     • Bloodytailspike
     • Dr. Sex, Ph.d, Esq.
     • Griffith
     • transgrammaractivist
     • opossum
     @transgrammaractivist @sickburnbro @Griffith @doctorsex @internetfreak @monsterislandcolonizer @opossum Hard disagree, power is power. Whoever has it has it. Lack of legitimacy (consent of the class power is excercised upon) does not in any way reduce power. It just provides fertile soil for opposition to grow in, but that opposition doesn't necessarily have any power itself.