@mmasnick.bsky.social why should a group of powerful, wealthy individuals who all worked for either nation state/government institutions or multinationals get to form a financial peer pressure group to influence public opinion under the populist disguise of safety without it becoming a matter of free speech?
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
ερμητικός (HERMETICVM) (hermeticvm@convo.casa)'s status on Saturday, 10-Aug-2024 05:40:03 JST ερμητικός (HERMETICVM) -
Embed this notice
Mike Masnick ✅ (mmasnick@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 10-Aug-2024 05:40:01 JST Mike Masnick ✅ @hermeticvm @mmasnick.bsky.social the framing of your question gives away both your bias and your ignorance. Let me reframe i accurately:
Why should a group of advertisers agree on a set of best practices they can send to companies, saying "this is what it will take to make us feel comfortable seeing our brands advertised on your site"?
Because that's what happened. Not the conspiracy-laden nonsense you just said.
-
Embed this notice
Mike Masnick ✅ (mmasnick@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 10-Aug-2024 06:39:37 JST Mike Masnick ✅ @hermeticvm @mmasnick.bsky.social it seemed like the only appropriate response to the way you phrased your question.
-
Embed this notice
ερμητικός (HERMETICVM) (hermeticvm@convo.casa)'s status on Saturday, 10-Aug-2024 06:39:39 JST ερμητικός (HERMETICVM) @mmasnick @mmasnick.bsky.social straight to the insult, I see.
-
Embed this notice