I'm surprised that no one has used ActivityPub to federate block and allow lists. All they are is a collection of actors. Even the instances themselves could be classified as a Service (which is a type of actor).
#ActivityPub #federation #fediverse
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Bryan Redeagle (bryan@soc.redeagle.me)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Aug-2024 11:56:13 JST Bryan Redeagle
- Tim Chambers repeated this.
-
Embed this notice
BeAware :veriweed: (beaware@social.beaware.live)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Aug-2024 11:56:11 JST BeAware :veriweed:
@bryan this is being worked on by Mastodon and is in the roadmap.
-
Embed this notice
Tim Chambers (tchambers@indieweb.social)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 12:04:48 JST Tim Chambers
@bryan 👀
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 12:06:43 JST Evan Prodromou
@thisismissem @bryan @smallcircles that's absolutely the right thing to do! It's an extensible protocol. Also, I think the `Block` activity is fine for this situation.
-
Embed this notice
Emelia 👸🏻 (thisismissem@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 12:06:44 JST Emelia 👸🏻
@bryan @smallcircles I did look into the viability of this, but ultimately decided against it due to addressing issues and lack of appropriate activity & object types — would've basically been inventing an entirely new vocabulary on top of AP.
-
Embed this notice
BeAware :veriweed: (beaware@social.beaware.live)'s status on Friday, 09-Aug-2024 12:09:22 JST BeAware :veriweed:
@thisismissem @bryan So, that being said, does that mean it should no longer be on the roadmap?🤔
Wondering because I also replied to the post thinking that it was still being looked into.
Thanks ahead of time.