Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Wednesday, 31-Jul-2024 14:28:31 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

   • Security Writer :verified: :donor:

   @SecurityWriter

   IOf you think we dont have massive secret bleeding edge tech projects still active today... i mean all I can say is I can tell you from personal experience as a person who has had top level clearance and worked on many govt projects... yes there are plenty such projects and not one of them is known to the public... obviously i wont say what they are (id wind up in jail)... but I can say such things exist.

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 06:45:14 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Security Writer :verified: :donor:
     • Marty Fouts

     @MartyFouts

     Absolutely incorrect. I have had clearance and can tell you it is perfectly legal to mention you have had or have clearance. In fact when looking for work it is usually the first thing a job that needs clearance will ask, if you had or have had clearance.

     @SecurityWriter

   • Embed this notice
     Marty Fouts (martyfouts@mastodon.online)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 06:45:15 JST Marty Fouts

     in reply to

     • Security Writer :verified: :donor:

     @freemo @SecurityWriter Tell me you don’t know that people with clearance are prohibited by law from revealing that they have clearance without telling me that.

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 09:46:00 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Security Writer :verified: :donor:
     • Marty Fouts

     @MartyFouts

     I'm not claiming the project was never compromised. I'm pointing to the fact that none of them are public knowledge and I can only presume I was only witness to a very very small percentage of projects.

     So the point stands, anyone who has had a clearance is well aware of just how many massive projects there are that remain secret enough to not be known to the general public.

     @SecurityWriter

   • Embed this notice
     Marty Fouts (martyfouts@mastodon.online)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 09:46:01 JST Marty Fouts

     in reply to

     • Security Writer :verified: :donor:

     @freemo @SecurityWriter Yes, there is an exception to the rule for applying for jobs that require clearance. But yes, there are rules that prohibit general disclosure. Anyway, even if you have had clearance; that you don’t know that a project has been compromised is only evidence of the limitations of your knowledge and not evidence of lack of compromise.

   • Embed this notice
     Marty Fouts (martyfouts@mastodon.online)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 10:16:59 JST Marty Fouts

     in reply to

     • Security Writer :verified: :donor:

     @freemo @SecurityWriter Again, that you don’t know that knowledge is widespread does not mean that it is not. Nor can you defend your claim because you would have to disclose a previously undisclosed project to demonstrate that you are right.

   • Embed this notice
     🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 10:16:59 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱

     in reply to

     • Security Writer :verified: :donor:
     • Marty Fouts

     @MartyFouts

     If a particular piece of knowledge were publicly known I'd know it, as I am part of the public. Not sure what you mean.

     @SecurityWriter