Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Luis Villa (luis_in_brief@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 06:57:57 JST Luis Villa

   Conflicts checks aren’t optional, kids.
   https://mastodon.social/@danielnazer/112809223784348095

   #lawfedi

   • Embed this notice
     Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 06:57:55 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

     in reply to

     • Kendra Albert

     @luis_in_brief @kendraserra

     Can Bright Data also bring a contract claim against Quinn?

   • Embed this notice
     Luis Villa (luis_in_brief@social.coop)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 06:57:56 JST Luis Villa

     in reply to

     • Kendra Albert

     And if you want actual analysis, not just snark, @kendraserra has you covered. https://dair-community.social/@kendraserra/112809469969901441

   • Embed this notice
     Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 07:18:02 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

     in reply to

     • Kendra Albert

     @kendraserra @luis_in_brief

     By my layperson reading, the engagement letter has a clause that they won't represent companies adverse to Bright Data in related matters. (It's included in Alsup's order.) But the legal industry parses sentences in ways beyond my ken, so thanks for the answer.

   • Embed this notice
     Kendra Albert (kendraserra@dair-community.social)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 07:18:03 JST Kendra Albert

     in reply to

     • Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

     @kingrat @luis_in_brief it would be surprising to me if Quinn's ethical duties were specifically laid out in an engagement letter such that they could be enforced via contract.