Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified: (fluffy@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:43:52 JST touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified:

   • pistolero
   Anyone have experience with blacked out FOI docs?
   
   I was glancing at the "Pre-September 11, 2001 Trading Review" today and noticed that the part explaining the newsletter's motivation was omitted.
   
   In practice, for what reasons do things end up omitted from FOI documents?
   
   cc @p
   image.png
   image.png
   • ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:01 JST pistolero

     in reply to

     • GNU/r000t
     • ?????? ????????????
     @fluffy @istvan @r000t Looks like it was physically blacked out and then scanned.
     
     > We have not developed any evidence suggesting that those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks traded on the basis of that information.
     
     > those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks
     
     > those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks
     
     > those who had advance knowledge of the September 11 attacks
     
     :globalistlocated:
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified: (fluffy@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:02 JST touch fluffy tail (Heroic) :verified:

     in reply to

     • GNU/r000t
     • ?????? ????????????
     • pistolero
     @p @r000t @istvan
     >Do you have PDFs or just those PNGs?
     here's the PDF
     9-11-sec-report.pdf
   • Embed this notice
     GNU/r000t (r000t@ligma.pro)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:03 JST GNU/r000t

     in reply to

     • ?????? ????????????
     • pistolero

     @istvan @fluffy @p #7 realistically lets them strike out literally anything they want about any criminal case, period.

   • Embed this notice
     pistolero (p@fsebugoutzone.org)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:03 JST pistolero

     in reply to

     • GNU/r000t
     • ?????? ????????????
     @r000t @istvan @fluffy "Catch-22 says that we don't have to tell you what Catch-22 says."
   • Embed this notice
     ?????? ???????????? (istvan@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 18-Jul-2024 04:44:04 JST ?????? ????????????

     in reply to

     • pistolero
     @fluffy @p Redactions are made when information within a document is exempt from the scope of FOIA.
     
     There are nine broad exemptions.
     
     1. Classified information.
     2. Information about Internal personnel rules and practices of the agency.
     3. Information blocked from disclosure by another law.
     4. Trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is confidential.
     5. Privileged communications within or between agencies.
     6. Information that would invade a private citizen’s privacy.
     7. Information for law enforcement purposes that could fuck up legal proceedings, constitute an invasion of privacy, reveal a confidential source, reveal techniques or practices of law enforcement, or put someone in danger.
     8. ANY information about the supervision of financial institutions.
     9. Geological information about wells.
     
     Anything they can tie to one of these they can strike out.