GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    David August (davidaugust@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 06-Jul-2024 02:14:30 JST David August David August

    House Democrat is proposing a constitutional amendment to reverse Supreme Court's immunity decision. We need it, even if GOP will stop it.

    https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-immunity-trump-biden-9ec81d3aa8b2fd784c1b155d82650b3e

    #scotus #politics #law #democracy #USpol #presidential #immunity #PresidentialImmunity #election

    In conversation about 11 months ago from mastodon.online permalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: dims.apnews.com
      House Democrat is proposing a constitutional amendment to reverse Supreme Court's immunity decision
      A leading House Democrat is preparing a constitutional amendment in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark immunity ruling. Rep.
    • Embed this notice
      David August (davidaugust@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 06-Jul-2024 09:12:29 JST David August David August
      in reply to
      • Wizard Bear (💉x8 + 😷)
      • Dimples

      @WizardBear @Magooish worth noting there’s a path to make a Constitutional Amendment that does not require anything of Congress.

      source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-constitution/

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. https://files.mastodon.online/media_attachments/files/112/736/510/724/057/733/original/b593a35a8a22391b.png
      2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.whitehouse.gov
        The Constitution | The White House
        Why a Constitution? The need for the Constitution grew out of problems with the Articles of Confederation, which established a “firm league of friendship” between the States, and vested most power in a Congress of the Confederation. This power was, however, extremely limited—the central government conducted diplomacy and made war, set weights and measures, and…
    • Embed this notice
      Wizard Bear (💉x8 + 😷) (wizardbear@mstdn.social)'s status on Saturday, 06-Jul-2024 09:12:31 JST Wizard Bear  (💉x8 + 😷) Wizard Bear (💉x8 + 😷)
      in reply to
      • Dimples

      @Magooish @davidaugust Amendments don't "require" constitutional conventions. That's just an option. They do require House and Senate approvals along with ratification of the states as noted. FWIW: The RW wants a constitutional convention to destroy our rights under the existing US Constitution.

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink
      GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      Dimples (magooish@mas.to)'s status on Saturday, 06-Jul-2024 09:12:32 JST Dimples Dimples
      in reply to

      @davidaugust
      I applaud the idea. But constitutional amendments are more complicated than passing a law. They require constitutional conventions, congressional approval by 2/3 majority and then ratification by 3/4 of the states. The ERA is still languishing decades later on the state approval.
      The idea of a CC also allows for proposals like banning abortion federally or enshrining immunity. So we need to be careful here. I’m not sure if this is the path.

      In conversation about 11 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.