Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 04:48:32 JST Church of Jeff -
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 04:55:18 JST Church of Jeff @rrb -- You say that like you haven't looked into #Project2025 yet...
-
Embed this notice
rrb (rrb@allthingstech.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 04:55:19 JST rrb @jeffowski Do you really believe that someone who flies an "Appeal to Heaven" flag would do that?
-
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 04:59:57 JST Church of Jeff @rrb -- Ah... that clears things up :)
OH... are you telling everyone about #Project2025 like I am?
I'm breaking any silence in any public space by stopping people and asking them if they have heard of #Project2025
-
Embed this notice
rrb (rrb@allthingstech.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 04:59:58 JST rrb @jeffowski Sorry, I should have used the <sarcasm> <\sarcasm> tags.
Will modify to fix that. -
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:04:18 JST Church of Jeff @rrb -- Because mainstream media is still trying to "both sides" the issue instead of raising the alarm.
This is a prime example of how the rich will side with fascists to maintain their wealth. They own all the large media corporations and have been pumping out "editorial" pieces to maintain the status quo where they are the rich and powerful people on top. -
Embed this notice
rrb (rrb@allthingstech.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:04:19 JST rrb Added the <sarcasm> tag.
My apologies.
The only good thing I can say about project 2025 is it was written by an idiot.
I think that supreme court ruling should give Dem's a boost. But, I do not understand why Dems are not showing back to back ads about pregnant working class women being airlifted out of red states due to the Dobbs ruling.
-
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:06:01 JST Church of Jeff @rrb -- There are other people besides White Male Christians you can talk to. Look for someone with breasts or darker (non-white) skin.
-
Embed this notice
rrb (rrb@allthingstech.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:06:03 JST rrb I live in South Carolina, so I do not see much hope in explaining reality to the rest of the state.
It is a nice place to live, if you can ignore the stench of the politics, and the evangelicals, and the residual racism, and ...
Well, the weather and landscape is nice.
-
Embed this notice
Sir Dave of the Clay Pitts (softbear@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:08:16 JST Sir Dave of the Clay Pitts Mary obviously lacks any concept of how this constitutional republic works and why it has lasted this long.
While most comments seem to think this makes the President above the law, the truth is nothing of the kind. It does help to clarify how to separate Official Acts from Private Acts.
So, the immunity decision protects others more than it helps Trump.
For example, when Trump takes office next January, he can't prosecute Obama for ordering assassinations, etc.
-
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:08:16 JST Church of Jeff @softbear -- Ok... Try to dismiss the quotes from the dissenting Supreme Court justices.
I'll wait. -
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:36:41 JST Church of Jeff @softbear -- So you don't see this Immunity for the President paired with #Project2025 as an extremely dangerous combination?
You sure do seem to be minimizing the dangers when it seems pretty clear that virtually everyone that actually knows something on the subject is raising concerns.
I'd be curious to find out which pundits you're listening to. You have to be forming your opinion from somewhere and who you are going to cite here will be very revealing.
Reply with links. -
Embed this notice
Sir Dave of the Clay Pitts (softbear@noauthority.social)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jul-2024 05:36:42 JST Sir Dave of the Clay Pitts Ah, I get it. Ignore the classical conservatives, but not the progressives.
I notice you don't mention the concurrence of Justice Jackson on the core finding, yet you don't castigate them. You include Barrett in the photo, but she dissented in part.
The concurring opinion of Justice Thomas is the one that shows the current administration is pursuing an illegal prosecution. You can expect this point to be revisited in the near future if the current activities persist.
-
Embed this notice
Church of Jeff (jeffowski@mastodon.world)'s status on Friday, 05-Jul-2024 05:00:12 JST Church of Jeff @softbear --
You're a sad joke if you think #Project2025 isn't a threat when they want to replace career government professionals with politically appointed loyalists that they vet and train specifically for.
#Jan6 and Trump's generally bumbling first administration was stunted because of these professionals doing their duty in their positions.
This shapes the next January 6th where those same people open the doors for the insurrectionists. -
Embed this notice
Sir Dave of the Clay Pitts (softbear@noauthority.social)'s status on Friday, 05-Jul-2024 05:00:13 JST Sir Dave of the Clay Pitts I'm not holding out on you, I just happened across this:
https://bird.makeup/users/vdhanson/statuses/1808634918723014685
(Yes, you might consider historian Victor Davis Hansen a pundit. I don't.)
-
Embed this notice