@blogdiva Well it's their property so unfortunately, they can decide what to do with it. They clearly felt that it was too difficult to convert things over to static sites since they weren't getting any revenue from it.
@mattsheffield no, news is not private property. history recorded thru journalism for centuries has not been treated as private property.
yes, it should be a landmark case against this bullshit neoliberal definition of private property.
journalism has for centuries been understood as a public good, not a private property. Americans needs to fight Paramount tooth & nail on this one. Zlatlan *is* a shameless fascist and this destruction of an important public good should not stand uncontested.
@mattsheffield this needs to become a landmark case. there is no way this should be allowed at all. news are a public good or they aren't. this needs to be fought to the death... of these corrupt executives.
@nicholas_saunders@blogdiva I agree that this is a great example of the value of "fair use," and why the Internet Archive is so valuable.
People should be able to preserve and exhibit copyrighted content for non-commercial purposes. It is no different than a library, and is actually more necessary since websites are so easily erased from the internet.