Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
I get the feeling that "only approved people can reply" on the Fediverse will end up being a giant mess. I don't hate the idea in theory but conversations are already super fragmented because of the architecture of the network
- Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: likes this.
-
Embed this notice
@sun that's just going to make stuff more buggy, lots of fragmented community and tons of headache for the admins.
-
Embed this notice
@sun how is that any different than the retarded lock which is stupid and only causes problems and is not at all secure
-
Embed this notice
@why you can still see the posts you just can't participate (at least, not on the original server)
-
Embed this notice
@sun This is where not understanding scope limitations comes in. If people use message scopes other than 'public', they wouldn't need this.
And yes, I know scoping is based on all servers voluntarily complying (and on the people who do see the post not screenshotting and posting it public). We lost that battle alreadty (twice! once during the earliest stages of AP development and standardization and again when Mastodon implemented message scopes).
-
Embed this notice
@why "I don't want randos replying to me"
-
Embed this notice
@sun whats the damn point
-
Embed this notice
@sun we gave them instance blocks and they destroyed federation
we gave them follower only posts and they destroyed federation
they wont stop asking for "features" until the site is identical to twitter.
-
Embed this notice
@why @sun everyday we deviate for the sake of needless vanity from the true purpose of fedi to distribute cumposts