Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:59 JST xianc78

   • BigDawg

   @BigDawg869789 It happened around the same time that Obama said he would sign the "Small Arms Treaty" at the UN which was basically an international gun control treaty.

   https://web.archive.org/web/20140305235005/http://www.groundzeromedia.org/mental-hopscotch/

   • Embed this notice
     Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:54 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to

     • Pawlicker
     • BigDawg
     @xianc78 @BigDawg869789 I think if anything, it's more "if you are big enough, you can get into legal trouble".
     
     Alex Jones is far from the only target of this, he was only the test run in a way. They're using it on the Gateway Pundit, Fox News, and many others over the election shit and Fox News folded hard.
     ✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:55 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to

     • BigDawg
     @xianc78 @BigDawg869789 But is it? The same trick is being used by the Dominion Voting Systems company as well. Why do you think Andrew Anglin fled the USA?
   • Embed this notice
     xianc78@gameliberty.club's status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:56 JST xianc78

     in reply to

     • Pawlicker
     • BigDawg

     @PurpCat @BigDawg869789 Some are claiming that the whole trials themselves are a psyop just to get people to believe that they can get into legal trouble for questioning certain events that the government doesn't want you to question.

     http://mileswmathis.com/jones3.pdf

   • Embed this notice
     BigDawg (bigdawg869789@poa.st)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:57 JST BigDawg

     in reply to

     • Pawlicker
     @PurpCat @xianc78 Ty, also, someone else posted a really good doc on the whole thing. Does a great job of just providing indesputable facts and not going off on theories. Only watched part of it so far but its great
     
     poa.st/@Goalkeeper@nicecrew.digital/posts/AivW1NagFTCSXDowGO
   • Embed this notice
     Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:57 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to

     • BigDawg
     @BigDawg869789 @xianc78 eventually shit got released with Sandy Hook after a local newspaper kept pushing hard for it to be released (iirc that documentary was made in 2014) and amateur "true crime" autists found the shooter's channel, which was quickly shut down by YouTube.
     
     Of course, when it's a $500m crime to question it...
   • Embed this notice
     Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:58 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to

     • Pawlicker
     • BigDawg
     @xianc78 @BigDawg869789 Also, there's a really good reason they don't want you to know the motives of these shooters. The writings of Audrey Hale were leaked out only because of how politically loaded the shooting was and how hard it was attempted to be suppressed. There were some of the same sus things going on around Sandy Hook, like the lawyers and related parties behaviors (in this case, the school itself wanting to suppress the publication of it).
     
     They really don't want you to know a woman larping as a man killed a bunch of kids and had writings wanting a penis.
   • Embed this notice
     Pawlicker (purpcat@clubcyberia.co)'s status on Saturday, 15-Jun-2024 09:35:59 JST Pawlicker

     in reply to

     • BigDawg
     @xianc78 @BigDawg869789 if you want something fun I learned the other day, the glowies made a new term called "Legacy Tokens".
     https://tennesseestar.com/justice/fbi-memo-on-protection-of-legacy-tokens-sent-to-nashville-police-in-may-2023-opposed-release-of-covenant-killer-documents-cited-destruction-precedent/tpappert/2024/06/05/
     
     "In its second point, the FBI acknowledges the desire for public release of “legacy tokens” often “revolves around the public’s need to understand what led to such tragic events.” However, the FBI claims “legacy tokens” seldom provide such comfort, and instead could lead the public “to dismiss the attacker as mentally ill,” which would “further permeate the false narrative that the majority of attackers are mentally ill.”
     
     The FBI, in its third point, claims that releasing “legacy tokens” will lead to the spread of “false narratives.”
     
     “Public access to legacy tokens will also facilitate false narratives and inaccurate information,” the FBI claimed, asserting that releasing information written by mass shooters will result in “pontificators” and “self-professed ‘experts'” who “will proffer their perspectives” in the press, “potentially inflaming the public.”
     
     Releasing “legacy tokens” could also result in “unintended consequences for the segment of the population more vulnerable or open to conspiracy theories, which will undoubtedly abound,” the FBI claimed.
     
     The memo also raised the precedent for destroying “legacy tokens,” noting materials from the 1999 Columbine High School attack were never released and permanently destroyed.
     
     The memo does not suggest destroying materials from an investigation, but it does inform Chief Drake, “There is existing precedent for not releasing legacy token materials to the public, most notably the decision to destroy the ‘Basement Tapes’ produced by the offenders of the Columbine High School attack.”"
     
     You are not allowed to know what happened.