@frebelt @netzpolitik_feed In addition to the point about democratic legitimacy, the sheer ignorance of the HLG is alarming. I have never seen a set of policy recommendations so divorced from reality. Everything is based on an imaginary premise that all devices and services can be backdoored for law enforcement access without creating any cybersecurity vulnerabilities or risks of abuse. Based on this fallacy, we get the worst ideas of the e-Evidence Regulation and Chat Control combined.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Jesper Lund (je5perl@eupolicy.social)'s status on Thursday, 06-Jun-2024 14:39:23 JST Jesper Lund -
Embed this notice
Friedemann (frebelt@mastodon.online)'s status on Thursday, 06-Jun-2024 14:39:24 JST Friedemann Finaly everybody can read the #EUGoingDark surveillance plan to reintroduce blanket #DataRetention and circumvent #encryption.
@netzpolitik_feed has the PDF: https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2024/06/2024-05-22-Recommendation-HLG-Going-Dark-c.pdf
❗Beware: Not a single line of this document can be considered a basis for any discussion. This is because the group is non-transparent, undemocratic, politically biased and works with the Going Dark myth, which assumes that law enforcement and security can only be achieved through more surveillance.
this.ven repeated this.
-
Embed this notice