Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
Girl on the Net (girlonthenet@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 28-May-2024 19:47:26 JST Girl on the Net

PSA: #AudioPorn is NOT more 'ethical' than video.
This time last year I had a big rant about why the dominant narrative around audio being more ethical is harmful and wildly inaccurate.
https://www.girlonthenet.com/blog/audio-porn-more-ethical-than-video/
In conversation about a year ago from mastodon.social permalink
Attachments
1. “Audio porn appeals to women because it’s gentler and more ethical” A dominant narrative is starting to emerge around audio porn, and it isn’t one that I – a woman and producer of audio porn – am particularly comfortable with. The narrative goes a little like this: “Video porn is demeaning to women and unethical, which is why women are flocking to audio. Audio is better for women because they don’t have to look at porn women’s bodies (which are all unrealistic and fake and make ‘real women’ feel bad) or worry that the women in the porn they enjoy are being exploited. Audio is more ethical than video porn because it isn’t misogynistic, it emphasises consent, and what’s more when you’re listening to a sexy story rather than watching actual physical sex, no dicks go inside anyone and that is OBVIOUSLY way more ethical than when a dick goes in.”
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/518/265/331/033/690/original/a76ab157a60912fd.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.girlonthenet.com
  
  Audio porn is not more ethical than video | Girl on the Net
  
  from Girl on the net
  
  Is audio porn more ethical than video? Less exploitative? More appealing to women? No. Let me, an audio erotica producer, explain why this is rubbish.
- Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.

Public

Conversation

Notices

Feeds