Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Adam Gessaman :vcoffee: (adam@windbag.org)'s status on Sunday, 21-Apr-2024 12:31:46 JST Adam Gessaman :vcoffee:

   Wow, they’re going to go to VAR for that? The league really hates the Sounders.

   #Sounders :sounders: #MLS :mls:

   • Embed this notice
     Phil in SF (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 21-Apr-2024 12:31:45 JST Phil in SF

     in reply to

     @adam doesn't matter of malicious. Ragen stepped on the back of Gauld's calf. studs to the leg is going to be red.

   • Embed this notice
     Adam Gessaman :vcoffee: (adam@windbag.org)'s status on Sunday, 21-Apr-2024 12:31:46 JST Adam Gessaman :vcoffee:

     in reply to

     And there’s the expected straight red—not because it was malicious but because PRO’s referees settled their contract dispute with MLS and returned to their primary goals of ruining the game and targeting the Sounders.

     #Sounders :sounders: #MLS :mls:

   • Embed this notice
     Phil in SF (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 21-Apr-2024 12:53:46 JST Phil in SF

     in reply to

     • Lee

     @adam @leeolds very clearly a challenge. "An action when a player competes/contests with an opponent for the ball."

   • Embed this notice
     Lee (leeolds@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 21-Apr-2024 12:53:47 JST Lee

     in reply to

     • Phil in SF

     @kingrat @adam Is that new? It hasn't been consistently enforced that way recently.

   • Embed this notice
     Adam Gessaman :vcoffee: (adam@windbag.org)'s status on Sunday, 21-Apr-2024 12:53:47 JST Adam Gessaman :vcoffee:

     in reply to

     • Phil in SF
     • Lee

     @leeolds @kingrat

     It wasn’t a tackle. Was it a lunge? Could be considered a challenge. They had to have evaluated the safety of the opponent language, right?