Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
@dave yea, it is, the idea is that the industries were carved up and handed to families friendly to them in a unique way post state ownership. so it is different originally but the term now means something like "very rich, usually owning something public with a degree of monopoly, very affiliated with politics and receives power on account of that". we have that in this country too though albeit their formative conditions were different not being post collapse.
- Doughnut Lollipop 【記録係】:blobfoxgooglymlem: likes this.
-
Embed this notice
I mean, isn't it because the situation with the wealth re-distribution in Russia was kind of unique, because the people we would describe as oligarchs acquired their wealth through political muscling to take control of existing production assets when the USSR dissolved, rather than building or buying them with existing capital?