"package maintainers"? more like "software librarians"
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
niconiconi (niconiconi@mk.absturztau.be)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 11:30:02 JST niconiconi - Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and Roy Tam like this.
-
Embed this notice
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 11:31:18 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: @niconiconi Except not really given how involved packagers are with upstreams, it's pretty rare to just take things as-is. -
Embed this notice
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 11:44:54 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: @niconiconi Which reminds me that I find "packaging" to describe the work way too reductive (and N/A for systems like gentoo where it's recipes).
As package maintainers mainly do system integration to the point of being potential fallback maintainers when the upstream ones are MIA. -
Embed this notice
LisPi (lispi314@udongein.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 04-Apr-2024 13:08:49 JST LisPi @lanodan @niconiconi More like editor-librarians than just librarians. Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.