GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:03:36 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
    • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

    @admitsWrongIfProven Nope, and once it is is the day capitalism would be flawless And there would no longer be a need for social programs.

    In conversation about a year ago from qoto.org permalink
    • Embed this notice
      NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U (admitswrongifproven@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:06:45 JST NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U
      in reply to

      @freemo I see. Your dream of monopoly control you were silent about for a time. Maybe, some time in the future. Maybe, same chances, some time separate from us. That would be nice.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:16:42 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @admitsWrongIfProven Monopoly? Are you saying monopolies are an indication of caring for one another? Not sure why your bringing up monopoloies out of nowhere

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U (admitswrongifproven@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:21:16 JST NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U
      in reply to

      @freemo The opposite.

      Remember BOFH. Absolute power....

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:37:23 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @admitsWrongIfProven Yea but in a world where everyone cares about eachother, which is the axiom, how would you have a BOFH, that would be a person who doesnt have compassion no?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U (admitswrongifproven@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:39:25 JST NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U
      in reply to

      @freemo The BOFH is a caricature of what happens already. And our petty squabbles are naught compared to what could be.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:43:49 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      Yea well we dont live in a world where people care about each other. So what happens "already" has no relevance to this hypothetical world where people do care about each other. In such a world, as I said, capitalism in its pure form would be ideal. You cant have the BOFH argument in such a world.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U (admitswrongifproven@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 10:48:40 JST NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U
      in reply to

      @freemo Oh.

      The way you describe it, the world should be barren. Seen in the light of utilitarianism, even barring negative utilitarianism, it would be best if nothing existed, in your world.

      Goethes Faust strikes again, it would be better if nothing existed :-)

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:03:10 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @cobratbq

      That was me.. ive said that many times (though maybe you mean someone else). Pure ideologies never work, it isnt about runaway, they are failures the moment they exist, they just generally rarely exist. Most things dont start out pure and only fail once they get pure or approach it.

      For example there is no completely pure capitalism or communism or socialism in existence today. In fact, aside from a few countries almost every country today is primarily capitalist with some socialism elements.

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      cobratbq - cranky-by-design (cobratbq@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:03:11 JST cobratbq - cranky-by-design cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @freemo @admitsWrongIfProven i heard one dude say that capitalism, just like socialism, if left alone becomes a runaway process that ends up in a bad extreme. He claimed both should balance each other out. 🤓

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      cobratbq - cranky-by-design (cobratbq@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:21:09 JST cobratbq - cranky-by-design cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @freemo @admitsWrongIfProven hmmm.. might be, but I recall it from a video. You might have said but I don't recall.
      I think he said: run-away socialism => communism, run-away capitalism => ... I forgot ... Tyranny?
      I think I'm wrong on the last part.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:23:14 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      Sure ill take a scooter to go get a popsicle, sounds yummy.

      @cobratbq

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U (admitswrongifproven@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:23:17 JST NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design

      @cobratbq @freemo Nah, the last part was fine. It is what is happening today.

      Anyone interested to take a scooter to get a popsicle without a smartphone to prove me wrong?

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:24:37 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @cobratbq

      I suppose they meant capitalism runs away to Corporatocracy.

      But this is misleading as corpratism isnt really a system of government but rather represents a distribution of power. where communism is a different system than socialism... like one can argue communism is the "pure" form of socialism more easily than one can argue corpratism is the pure form of capitalism.. but we are in the weeds here.

      Personally I would say all of these are cvery different things (communism is where both the means of distribution and productions are owned by government, and socialism is where just the means of production is), and almost no countries today are either of these most countries are some form of capitalism with social welfare programs, and I would argue social welfare is not a reduced form of socialism.

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      cobratbq - cranky-by-design (cobratbq@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:25:04 JST cobratbq - cranky-by-design cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @freemo @admitsWrongIfProven it is what I meant indeed.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 11:25:04 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @cobratbq

      Sorry you meant Corporatocracy not corpratism. I mixed them up in my head accidentally.

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 12:16:50 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @cobratbq

      I guess it depends on how he was using the terms.. the terms are abused quite a bit and even officially there are conflicting definitions.

      To really pick apart the statement (Which i think we agree on in principle at least) id really need to know what he means by "socialism" and how socialism cvan even exist without any capitalism in place and not just be communism by definition.

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      cobratbq - cranky-by-design (cobratbq@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 12:16:51 JST cobratbq - cranky-by-design cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @freemo @admitsWrongIfProven hmm .. yeah that could be. Those -isms are less well-known to me. I'll lean on your knowledge there.
      About socialism and communism: I get the distinction you're making, but I think the idea of that guy, centered around taking away capitalism as counteracting force, then at socialism your next logical/natural step would take you on the road to communism. I can see that happen. But, sure, socialism and communism themselves are distinct.

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      cobratbq - cranky-by-design (cobratbq@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 12:57:53 JST cobratbq - cranky-by-design cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      in reply to
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @freemo @admitsWrongIfProven it was a short video. I can't find it anymore. He wasn't as careful in choosing words, because it was meant as a general message. You're certainly close, and certainly more accurate.
      Thanks for clarifying. 😄

      In conversation about a year ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 12:57:53 JST 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 🎓 Doc Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱
      in reply to
      • cobratbq - cranky-by-design
      • NOS :facebook: 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U

      @cobratbq

      Fair, yea when it comes to these terms most people arent too careful, and frankly it can be hard to be without defining it yourself since the official definitions themselves are so varied.

      @admitsWrongIfProven

      In conversation about a year ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.