@Betty @lookitmychicken I definitely prefer funny miscommunication to angsty miscommunication. I sometimes even like funny miscommunication if it's not too drawn out
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Forestofglory (forestofglory@wandering.shop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 08:57:13 JST Forestofglory -
Embed this notice
Chicken :cqlgusu: (lookitmychicken@blorbo.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 08:57:12 JST Chicken :cqlgusu: @Forestofglory @Betty
Funny miscommunication can be hilarious. I'm remembering a short fic in which substitute teacher WWX introduced himself as "a sub" to Dom LWJ -
Embed this notice
Chicken :cqlgusu: (lookitmychicken@blorbo.social)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 09:11:14 JST Chicken :cqlgusu: Oh it was actually pretty good because of course WWX discovered he was very into being a submissive after he worked out there had been a miscommunication.
I don't remember if LWJ even realised that there'd been a miscommunication until after WWX had already become LWJ's submissive. At which point he would've already been so contented that no embarrassment about miscommunication could touch him.
-
Embed this notice
Forestofglory (forestofglory@wandering.shop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Mar-2024 09:11:15 JST Forestofglory @lookitmychicken @Betty wow that particular one hits my second hand embarrassment squick pretty hard! But in general I do prefer miscommunication to be on the shorter side
-
Embed this notice