Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
"Halp! Bf found out I'm a filthy slam-pig!"
-
Embed this notice
@matty @Anon_Z @JoePrich @Jewpacabra the mgtow stuff was a way to get men started on the confidence mindset.
in a world of feminism, saying you don't need women in a revolutionary act
-
Embed this notice
Women are great. I love them. Personally I think the MGTOW stuff is a jewish trick to get retarded men to feel sorry for themselves rather than be the leaders they need to be. Here's how you can get all the women you want in a step by step guide
1. Don't be retarded sperg
2. Be confident, even if you're not
It's that easy
-
Embed this notice
Joe the one thing NCD needs is more threads bashing/attacking women. Thanks for starting this one! @matty
-
Embed this notice
@Anon_Z @JoePrich Yeah no, if you weren’t a terminally online tard and had any kind of pull with women (you can get them to reveal a lot if they like you), you’d know they’re like this.
-
Embed this notice
This written by some angry 30 year old incel (quite possibly someone that posts here).
-
Embed this notice
@Anon_Z @JoePrich @matty @Jewpacabra I assume you have no clue how men feel.
-
Embed this notice
I don't give a fuck whether you need women or not however I get tired of seeing threads that do nothing but bash women as stupid/worthless/used up holes etc...
From my understanding we are supposed to avoid infighting on this platform so when shit like that is posted I guess the women are expected to just "suck it up" and tolerate endless insults?
-
Embed this notice
I never said you couldn't defend yourself or your positions - in fact i encourage it. Just don't cry to me when people bite back. That goes for everyone. I removed PepperCave from NCD because of that reason. But, if your belief system is "women can do no wrong", then Spinster may be a better fit for you dear.
-
Embed this notice
@1137 @Anon_Z @Sui @JoePrich @matty @Jewpacabra @sickburnbro All I‘m going to say is you may have answered my longstanding question about why so many males refuse to practice safe sex & believe their partner is being petty for requiring it.
-
Embed this notice
@ShemsBorealis @1137 @Anon_Z @Sui @JoePrich @matty @Jewpacabra "safe sex" is a evil workshopped term. A woman sleeping with 80 men is no less emotionally destroyed if they use condoms or not. Your body releases hormones when you have sex for bonding and a woman tries to bond with 80 men, her brain is going to be fried.
Men instinctively don't like condoms because its a woman saying "I want to use you as a giant hugable dildo"
-
Embed this notice
@ShemsBorealis @Anon_Z @Sui @JoePrich @matty @Jewpacabra @sickburnbro On a moral level, yes, all are degraded. On a physical level, the male is less likely to experience transmissible diseases and long term effects such as cervical cancer. Ethically, the lack of disclosure by the woman to her incipient husband indicates she is dishonest at her core.
In general males that do a group sex thing are considered participants in something grotesque. The woman is considered the grotesque object for having been the subject of the behavior.
It's not fair or evenhanded. I'm just saying what I think about this weird situation. Overall it is very sad, especially for the unborn child.
-
Embed this notice
@1137 @Anon_Z @Sui @JoePrich @matty @Jewpacabra @sickburnbro just curious, not being a smartass - do you believe that a man having had multiple or high number of partners before marriage is degraded to the same status described for this particular female?
-
Embed this notice
@Anon_Z @Sui @JoePrich @matty @Jewpacabra @sickburnbro I did reply to this thread, but I don't think I have seen poasts degrading this woman. Having said that, my recommendation was that he should not pursue the marriage with her. Because of her sexual history? Yes, to a point, but more so because she was deceitful in not telling him about it previously. She is young, of childbearing age, but has had over 80 sex partners. This is very much akin to being a previous IV drug user in terms of health risks. She has questionable morals, having group sex with three men (who also have questionable morals) on camera. She never disclosed any of this to someone who wants to a lifetime commitment? No. I don't slam people for their past mistakes. 80+ and 3 at a time on camera with no disclosure is not a mistake. It is demonstrative of mental health issues and extraordinary dishonesty.
TL:DR This person is dishonest and has a history of instability. This is an observation, not a judgement.
-
Embed this notice
Could also set it up so you block certain terms, right? We can regulate the kind of shit we want to see, but bitching isn't going to change people around here. If it helps just pretend the mockery is just jokes 🤷♂️
-
Embed this notice
Historically I just muted the posters that promoted those views but I am realizing that may not work here as it is apparently much more widespread and it will mean muting a lot of people I followed and liked. I will need to reevaluate the entire situation.
JoePrich
Bread up, Bro
Matty
Anon_Z
ElJewpacabra
ShemsBorealis
rs6
:suihead:
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the