Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 12:08:20 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

   in reply to

   • :afire: palingenetic man :afire:
   Can this even originate in the senate? Doesn't it require appropriation?
   • Embed this notice
     :afire: palingenetic man :afire: (anonaccount@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 12:08:21 JST :afire: palingenetic man :afire:
     >A sweeping Senate bill would radically expand in vitro fertilization and other reproductive technologies for military service members without regard to their sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status, promoting the creation of children outside of marriage, including between two men and their hired surrogates. [later] Such services directly undermine the family and use taxpayer funding to create, preserve, implant, and destroy embryonic human life. It even goes so far as to reimburse service members when they buy someone else’s egg or sperm. All under the alphabet soup banner of the rainbow flag.
     
     >Democrats pushed for a unanimous consent agreement Tuesday, meaning, if passed, the Veteran Families Health Services Act would sidestep the normal legislative review process. Thankfully, Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., refused to give unanimous consent.
     
     >For a long time, the military has covered certain IVF and egg and sperm preservation services for active duty service members who suffered or may suffer an injury that leads to infertility. Military benefits have typically been restricted to the service member, his or her married spouse, and in some cases, their dependents. This radical act, however, would expand IVF access to nonmarried partners and women who serve as gestational surrogates, too. Instead of encouraging family formation, the Veteran Families Health Services Act explicitly promotes the artificial creation of children outside of marriage. Worst of all, federal taxpayer dollars will foot the bill.
     
     >This also means that a man who can’t get pregnant (oh, wait, that includes all men) or a woman who cannot conceive a child with her female partner (yep, this is the same for all lesbian relationships, too) could qualify as “infertile” and receive taxpayer-funded IVF through the military. Infertility here is radically redefined to refer not to a physical deficiency but to a lifestyle choice.
     
     As long as the lives of the neurotypical white youth are not forced to die for the MICIMATT, it's fine by me.
     
     dailysignal.com/2024/03/12/military-bill-expands-ivf-services-gay-transgender-service-members