Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Curtis Rock, SkD (curtis@social.teci.world)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 12:09:54 JST Curtis Rock, SkD -
Embed this notice
Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 12:15:40 JST Alex Gleason I'm trying to figure out how/why this is different than ActivityPub. -
Embed this notice
Josh Adams (josh@social.rebased.network)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 12:15:41 JST Josh Adams Bits of this look dope at first glance -
Embed this notice
Matt Hamilton [Maryland] (eriner@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:16:42 JST Matt Hamilton [Maryland] The biggest difference I see is Identity management: https://atproto.com/guides/identity
That said...
> Usernames are DNS names. They are resolved using the resolveName() XRPC method and should be confirmed by a matching entry in the DID document.
> DIDs are an emerging W3C standard for providing stable & secure IDs. They are used as stable, canonical IDs of users.W3C, you say? An "emerging standard" (quickly to be abandoned once deficiencies are identified), you say?
Alex Gleason likes this.Alex Gleason repeated this. -
Embed this notice
Matt Hamilton [Maryland] (eriner@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:17:00 JST Matt Hamilton [Maryland] I also find it amusing how Jack and the BlueSky people continue to go out of their way to ignore the fact that AP exists. It has problems that need to be fixed, but just straight ignoring it is pretty funny.
from blueskyweb.xyz:
> The web. Email. RSS feeds. XMPP chats. What all these technologies had in common is they allowed people to freely interact and create content, without a single intermediary.
Missing anything, anyone? Bueller?
-
Embed this notice
Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:23:17 JST Alex Gleason They actually do mention it frequently on their blog (https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/3-6-2022-a-self-authenticating-social-protocol ) and they invited Eugen to a discussion about it (there's some PDF floating around).
Inventing a new protocol instead of fixing the current one is very pretentious though. I wonder if they don't want the existing userbase on purpose. -
Embed this notice
кину奇诺 (kino@fedi.intkos.link)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:25:28 JST кину奇诺 @eriner@noagendasocial.com You act like them "forgetting" about ActivityPub as a protocol or the Fediverse as thing isn't purely intentional on their part.
@alex@gleasonator.com @josh@social.rebased.network @curtis@social.teci.worldIn conversation permalink Alex Gleason likes this. -
Embed this notice
Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:27:50 JST Alex Gleason I think they see bluesky replacing ActivityPub to the point it's not relevant. It's not a "settled thing" yet (they are right). In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:28:57 JST Alex Gleason Yeah, what's up with that? Can you @ a user or not? In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
opal hart (opal@ap.maladaptive.art)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:29:00 JST opal hart @eriner @alex @josh @curtis tagging bare domain names seems odd from a ux standpoint In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Matt Hamilton [Maryland] (eriner@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:31:33 JST Matt Hamilton [Maryland] @alex @josh @curtis I actually don't mind the creation of a new protocol rather than trying to duct-tape and bubblegum AP.
If it's simpler to implement than AP and solves my gripes with AP (while not introducing new problems), I'll take it.
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:31:33 JST Alex Gleason Same, but I wish it wasn't woke sjws. In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
кину奇诺 (kino@fedi.intkos.link)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:42:12 JST кину奇诺 @alex@gleasonator.com Last time I read their spec they were wanting to somehow utilize blockchain to keep track of accounts so that users would have immutable identities across instances which I found extremely dystopian and very suspect.
In conversation permalink Alex Gleason likes this. -
Embed this notice
кину奇诺 (kino@fedi.intkos.link)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 15:42:13 JST кину奇诺 @alex@gleasonator.com Blackpilled again.
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 22:35:00 JST Hoss Delgado I don't mind a new protocol being created, but I certainly don't want fucking Jack Dorsey spearheading the effort. In conversation permalink Alex Gleason likes this. -
Embed this notice
Curtis Rock, SkD (curtis@social.teci.world)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 23:50:17 JST Curtis Rock, SkD I’m lightly monitoring Nostr protocol development on Telegram. I’m curious about what they plan to deploy as their discovery methodology
In conversation permalink Alex Gleason likes this. -
Embed this notice
Fediverse Contractor (bot@seal.cafe)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 23:50:18 JST Fediverse Contractor There’s also manyverse and scuttlebutt that was meant to allow you to connect directly to other people without servers but that didn’t actually work so they removed that functionality. In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
David Bucienski :verified: (davidb@noagendasocial.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 23:50:20 JST David Bucienski :verified: @eriner @alex @josh @curtis there is another decentralized social network called Farcaster. It uses RSS as its protocol. I think only 10k people are on it. Listened to the founder, he never mentioned fediverse and what problem Farcaster solves.
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Wednesday, 19-Oct-2022 23:51:20 JST Alex Gleason Nostr has some great ideas, but it gives users more freedom at the cost of a lot of convenience. Maybe too much convenience. In conversation permalink
-
Embed this notice