Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 05:44:40 JST Bread up, Bro
   they can simply say this isn't an invasion.
   • Embed this notice
     teknomunk (teknomunk@apogee.polaris-1.work)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 06:00:59 JST teknomunk

     in reply to
     @sickburnbro They would be lying when they say it, but that has never stopped a politician before.
     Bread up, Bro likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Bread up, Bro (sickburnbro@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 06:02:39 JST Bread up, Bro

     in reply to

     • teknomunk
     @teknomunk well, I mean they could even make a semi-reasoned "historically invasion would have to be organized by a foriegn power with the immediate goal of overthrowing a recognized government"
   • Embed this notice
     ☢️ :hacker_s: :hacker_n: :hacker_e: :hacker_e: :hacker_d: :what_a_shame: (nitrodubs@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 24-Jan-2024 06:07:16 JST ☢️ :hacker_s: :hacker_n: :hacker_e: :hacker_e: :hacker_d: :what_a_shame:

     in reply to

     • teknomunk
     @teknomunk @sickburnbro Arguably it was an invasion before the Reagan amnesty. They refuse to refer to it as an invasion now only because they aren’t all armed.
     Bread up, Bro likes this.