Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Sunday, 14-Jan-2024 06:34:06 JST Sexy Moon @ww @Arcana
1. NYT A/B tests front page contents so an archive site is not going to definitively going to tell you what everyone saw.
2. "i'm not sure why the new york times would be using an ai from a company they're suing" you're thinking like a human not like a business.- Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: and clacke like this.
-
Embed this notice
ww (ww@xyzzy.link)'s status on Sunday, 14-Jan-2024 06:34:08 JST ww @Arcana unlikely. the message this screenshot shows as being from 3 minutes ago was posted yesterday at 19:10 utc:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240112192756/https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/01/11/world/israel-hamas-houthi-yemen-news
which means the screenshot was taken at 19:13 utc. the article in question already had the same summary it does now earlier than that, at 18:46 utc:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240112184617/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/12/world/europe/mideast-war-israel-yemen.html
it’s had it since before it was first placed on the main page somewhere between 18:47 utc and 18:54 utc:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240112184700/https://www.nytimes.com/
https://web.archive.org/web/20240112185438/https://www.nytimes.com/
i'm not sure why the new york times would be using an ai from a company they're suing to revise a perfectly acceptable human-written summary at least half an hour later than it was originally published