Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Erlend Sogge Heggen (erlend@writing.exchange)'s status on Friday, 12-Jan-2024 08:03:33 JST Erlend Sogge Heggen

   • Creative Commons

   @creativecommons we are in dire need of a non-commercial content license made with the #opensocialweb in mind.

   The CC org could spark a lot of generative dialog by simply *drafting* such a license in the open, long before calling it Done.

   I don’t know how to put this in generalized legal language, but I know what I oppose.

   I do NOT consent to my content being used in:
   - for-profit #advertising
   - for-profit LLM/SMM #ai training
   - for-profit profiling

   My content belongs to the NC-SA #commons

   • Embed this notice
     Tim Chambers (tchambers@indieweb.social)'s status on Friday, 12-Jan-2024 08:05:26 JST Tim Chambers

     in reply to

     • Creative Commons

     @erlend @creativecommons

     ❤️ love this idea… 👍

   • Embed this notice
     Erlend Sogge Heggen (erlend@writing.exchange)'s status on Friday, 12-Jan-2024 10:05:41 JST Erlend Sogge Heggen

     in reply to

     • Tim Chambers
     • Ben Ramsey
     • Creative Commons

     @ramsey @tchambers @creativecommons theoretically yes. But judging by the way bad faith actors like generative AI companies in particular are behaving, we may benefit from updated versions that are more explicit in their limitations, similar to how the AGPL upgraded the protections of GPL.

   • Embed this notice
     Ben Ramsey (ramsey@phpc.social)'s status on Friday, 12-Jan-2024 10:05:42 JST Ben Ramsey

     in reply to

     • Tim Chambers
     • Creative Commons

     @tchambers @erlend @creativecommons Isn’t this already what BY-NC or BY-NC-SA do?

     Tim Chambers repeated this.