Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 (osma@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jan-2024 03:07:11 JST Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦

   • marius
   • Risotto Bias
   • Hrefna (DHC)
   • 🏴A bas la propriété lucrative

   @hrefna
   Moreover, if a protocol as all-encompassing as ActivityPub/ActivityStreams would need to first standardize a feature to the protocol foundations before anyone could implement that feature for their service, absolutely nothing could ever be done. It's hard enough today with so much of what has been defined in the protocol being so vague.

   Standards-track RFCs require several implementations for a reason.
   @oranadoz @mariusor @helge @risottobias

   • Embed this notice
     🏴A bas la propriété lucrative (oranadoz@framapiaf.org)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jan-2024 03:07:14 JST 🏴A bas la propriété lucrative

     • marius
     • Risotto Bias
     • Hrefna (DHC)

     @mariusor I agree this would be great, but this won't happen as long as servers implement only their own interface, and by doing so server implementers don't work on common additional services like searching, but only adds stuff to their proprietary interface to make their life easier (but not clients' life).
     @helge @risottobias @hrefna @osma

   • Embed this notice
     small circle 🕊 in calmness (smallcircles@social.coop)'s status on Thursday, 04-Jan-2024 03:08:42 JST small circle 🕊 in calmness

     • marius
     • Risotto Bias
     • Robin Berjon
     • Hrefna (DHC)
     • 🏴A bas la propriété lucrative

     @hrefna @osma @oranadoz @mariusor @helge @risottobias

     For those interested to ponder #ATProto + #ActivityPub ... at #SocialHub we have a discussion thread about @robin article on the subject:

     https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/robin-berjon-running-activitypub-over-atproto/3707