Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
You know, I was just wondering why my car & home insurance was just updated. I'll bet it reads the same way.
-
Embed this notice
@TimeSpent @VonBora @Wormwood There have been businesses destroyed in riots that didn't get insurance coverage. Fair I guess, but it sucks.
-
Embed this notice
@Rudolf_von_Goldenbaum @VonBora @Wormwood It does. Which is why I advocate for the names of the rioters collected and the bills sent directly to them. Garnish their wages and in the event money cannot be collected from them, the bill be deferred to their parents.
There are some holes in the riot lingo, though. Hence why $2 billion was paid out by insurance companies for the Floyd riots.
-
Embed this notice
@VonBora @Wormwood It's not. War would be too large of an expense for any company to compensate for and be fiscally solvent which is why it is a standard exclusion on any policy.
-
Embed this notice
I have seen it while reading policies. So why is this a new clause?
-
Embed this notice
@VonBora @Wormwood War has always been excluded on insurance policies since the September 11th terror attacks.