@Moon @ezri @larsfrommars “not letting teens stay out all night” isnt what im talking about though
my main point is that most people base their morality solely on how much disgust they have towards something, rather than the actual impact it has, meaning that when theres a situation that has the same impact but doesn’t trigger their disgust, they don’t have any problem with it
and this carries over to what i can only describe as non-sexual grooming, situations that have the same emotional dynamic to sexual grooming (and traumatize the victim similarly), but contain nothing directly sexual
e.g. objectifying someone and treating them as being a Single Thing, ignoring every part of them that doesn’t fit into what you want out of them, and trying to make them think that your perception of them is Absolute Truth (this isn’t a great explanation; its hard to put it into words and actually get across The Whole Picture™)
telling a teenager “oh you have to come home by [time]” isnt directly part of this, but telling them that they have a Moral Duty to do whatever their parent says is (its not the worst that this type of situation can get, but it absolutely contributes)
sexual grooming is awful because of the trauma it causes to the victim, and people do in fact treat it as bad
non-sexual grooming is also awful, and also traumatizes the victim, but it’s treated as perfectly fine (and even encouraged!) by most of society because they don’t feel disgusted by it
the end result is that the reason people treat sexual grooming as bad isnt because of the harm it causes, its solely because of disgust